• twitter-icon

Search results for: IT Act

Bombay HC's Order in The Case of Gateway Terminals India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Bombay HC: Interest on FDs and TDS Refund Linked to Business Eligible for Deduction U/S 80IA

The Bombay High Court has ruled that interest earned on fixed deposits and TDS refunds related to business activities are eligible for deduction under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act. This decision provides clarity on the classification of these income types in the context of tax deductions. Tax incentives for businesses are being given […]

CBDT Notification No. 133/2025 Related to the Income-tax Rules

CBDT Introduces Rules 3C and 3D U/S 17(2) via Notification No. 133/2025

The CBDT has released a notification No. 133/2025/F. No. 370142/27/2025-TPL that brings important updates to the Income Tax Rules set in 1962. This update is part of the Income Tax (Twenty Second Amendment) Rules, 2025, and it aims to improve how income tax regulations work. A recent update has introduced two new rules, Rule 3C […]

Chennai ITAT's Order In Case of Sivakarthick Raman vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Chennai ITAT: Salary Received by a Chinese Citizen Not Taxable in India If Deposited in an Indian Bank

Chennai ITAT has ruled that if a person from a Chinese resident earns a salary for work done in China, that income won’t be taxable in India, even if the money is deposited in an Indian bank account. Manu Kumar Giri (Judicial Member) and S.R. Raghunatha (Accountant Member) said that “the AO has disallowed the […]

Ahmedabad ITAT's Order in The Case of Jigar Patel vs. The Income Tax Officer

ITAT Ahmedabad Upholds ₹45.5 Lakh Addition for Bogus Agricultural Income

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Ahmedabad has confirmed a decision to add ₹45.5 lakh to a person’s income due to claims of fake agricultural income. This means that the tribunal found that the individual was improperly reporting income from farming that wasn’t real. It was discovered that the taxpayer’s explanation that there has been […]

Orissa HC' Order in The Case of Society for Training Action Research vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes

Orissa HC: Section 12A Exemption Can’t Be Denied Solely for Delay in Submitting Audit Report

The Orissa High Court ruled that the benefit of the exemption claim under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, should not have been rejected solely on the ground of delay in filing the audit report. The Society for Training Action Research filed a petition challenging the ruling that dismissed its request for condonation […]

CBDT Circular No. 07/2025 for ITRs Filed U/S 119(2)(b)

CBDT Approves Condonation for Late ITRs U/S 119(2)(b) Till March 2024

Circular No. 07/2025 has been issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) that grants relief to the taxpayers whose income tax returns were filed late, though accepted under the condonation of the delay provisions. The same has emerged when issues were raised for the non-processing of these returns, which results in delayed refunds. […]

Delhi ITAT's Order in The Case of Ashok Kumar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(5)

ITAT Delhi: Tax Deduction U/S 54F Not Allowed for Property Bought in Mother’s Name

The Delhi Bench of the ITAT decided that a taxpayer could not claim a tax deduction for buying a house because the property was registered in their mother’s name An individual taxpayer, Ashok Kumar, has faced scrutiny for the AY 2015-16. An income tax return (ITR) has been furnished by the taxpayer specifying an income […]

Madras HC's Order In Case of M/s.KLP Projects Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Madras HC: Limitation Period Begins from Seizure Date, Upholds Validity of Section 153C IT Notice

According to the Madras High Court, the limitation period for issuing notices under Section 153C to a third party begins on the date the materials are seized or requisitioned, not on the date of the search. M/s. KLP Projects Private Limited (applicant) has submitted the writ petitions against notices on 30.12.2024 and an order on […]

New Delhi CESTAT's Order In the Case of M/S.Sannam S-4 Management Services India Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Commissioner of CGST

CESTAT: No Service Tax on Consultancy to Foreign Clients, Not Classified as Intermediary Services

The taxpayer’s consultancy services to the foreign university/foreign group entity do not fall under the category of “intermediary services”, and the taxpayer is qualified for the advantage of “export of services,” New Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The Bench of Binu Tamta (Judicial Member) and (Technical Member) has said […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software