• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Kerala HC Orders ITC Can’t Be Refused for Delay in Filing GST Returns U/S 16(5) of CGST

Kerala HC's Order In the Case of Philip Thomas Vs State Tax Officer

The Kerala High Court, in a ruling, held that input tax credit for FY 2019–20 cannot be rejected on the ground of late filing of GST returns if the return was filed before the cut-off date of 30 November 2021, as stipulated under Section 16(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act (CGST).

The case has emerged after the State GST authorities passed an order u/s 73 of the CGST Act denying the claim of the applicant for ITC on the ground that the return for March 2020 was not submitted within the time specified u/s 16(4) of the Act. Recovery proceedings were initiated against the applicant based on the same order.

The counsel of the applicant said that though the return for March 2020 was submitted on 2 November 2020, the authorities incorrectly refused the credit by relying on Section 16(4). The subsequently introduced Section 16(5) of the CGST Act allows the taxpayer to claim ITC for the FY 2019-20 if the return was submitted on or before 30 November 2021.

The counsel, the applicant’s GST return was submitted before the same cut-off date, so the refusal of credit was not legal.

Read Also: How Modern GST Filing Software Keeps Your Financial Data Safe

The single-judge bench of Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A., after hearing both sides, stated that the impugned order itself specifies that the return for March 2020 has been submitted dated 2 November 2020. The court mentioned that Section 16(5) starts with a non-obstante clause and overrides the time limit stipulated u/s 16(4) of the GST Act.

After fulfilling the conditions u/s 16(5), the earlier limitation u/s 16(4) loses its relevance. The Court held that interference was needed in the case. The order has been quashed by the Court, denying the GST ITC along with the recovery notice issued thereafter.

It asked the related State Tax Officer to reconsider the case and provide the benefit of ITC u/s 16(5) of the CGST Act, if the applicant is otherwise qualified, post furnishing him a chance of hearing. Thereafter, the Court asked that fresh orders be passed within 3 months from the date of receipt of the judgment.

Case TitlePhilip Thomas Vs State Tax Officer
Case No.WP(C) No.46773 of 2025
For PetitionerSmt K.Krishna, Shri Achyuth Menon, Shri Joy P.j., Shri. V. Harisankar, Smt Anna Anto
For RespondentSmt Reshmitha R Chandran
Kerala High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.
View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Tax Offer 2026

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates