• twitter-icon

Search results for: Income tax Act

Bangalore ITAT's Order In The Case of Laxmilal Badolla Vs NFAC

ITAT Bangalore: No Tax Penalty U/S 271D for Cash Receipts If Reasonable Cause Exists

In the matter of Laxmilal Badolla vs. NFAC (ITAT Bangalore), the issue is concerned with the levying of penalty u/s 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning cash receipts in the course of the AY 2016-17. A Detailed summary of the judgment delivered by the ITAT Bangalore has been stated below- Backdrop: Laxmilal Badolla, […]

Rajasthan HC's Order In The Case of Laxmi Meena Vs Union of India & Ors.

Rajasthan HC Upholds Use of IT Section 148A(d) for Inquiry into Suspected Tax Discrepancies

The matter of Laxmi Meena Vs Union of India & Ors. before the Rajasthan High Court is concerned with the legality of proceedings initiated u/s 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, established on facts proposing differences in reported income from a property transaction. Below is a detailed case summary: A Summary of the Arguments […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order In Case of Ravi Nirman Nigam Ltd Vs ACIT

Mumbai ITAT: Tax Penalty U/S 271D & 271E Can’t Be Charged When Assessment Order Canceled

Tax Penalty u/s. 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be charged if the assessment proceedings are quashed. Under section 147 of the Act, the matter of the taxpayer was reopened on the grounds of the data obtained from the office of, ACIT, Central Circle-2(4), Ahmedabad. An investigation was performed at the […]

CA Day Offer Tax Software

2024 CA Day: Flat 50% Off on Tax, Payroll, and ROC Software

Like every year, SAG Infotech brings exclusive discounts on its wide range of software solutions designed for CA professionals and experts. On the occasion of CA (Chartered Accountant) Day on July 1, 2024, the company offers a flat 50% discount on select tax, ROC/MCA, and payroll software, except GST. The company product portfolio includes Genius, […]

MP State Ministers Must Be Ready to Pay Income Tax

Madhya Pradesh State Cabinet Overturnes a 1972 Rule, Now Ministers to Pay Income Tax

The Madhya Pradesh Cabinet decided that state ministers shall pay their income tax on salaries and allowances, striking down a 1972 rule under which the state government paid it for them. Urban Administration Minister Kailash Vijayvargiya expressed the proceed was proposed by Chief Minister Mohan Yadav at the time of the Cabinet meeting. “The Chief […]

Delhi ITAT's Order in the Case of Suchi Agrawal Versus ITO

Delhi ITAT: Not Compulsory to Submit Form 67 to Avail FTC (Foreign Tax Credit)

The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that submission of Form-67 is not obligatory to claim foreign tax credit (FTC). The bench of Sudhir Pareek (Judicial Member) and S. Rifaur Rahman (Accountant Member) has marked that filing Form-67 is a procedural or directory provision and is not a compulsory requirement. Thus, […]

Kerala HC’s Order in the Case of Balan Panicker Ramesh Kumar Vs. Union of India

Kerala HC: No Income Tax Exemption for Employees on Earned Leave Encashment Without Government Notification

Kerala High Court ruled that employees cannot claim income tax exemption without government notification fixing the income limit for earned leave salary. Balan Panicker Ramesh Kumar, an applicant asked for the guidance of the respondent department to examine the income limit for tax purposes on earned leave salary u/s 10AA(ii) of the Income Tax Act, […]

Direct Tax Collections for FY 2024-25

CBDT Shares Direct Tax Collections Increased by 22.19 Percent

Gross Direct Tax collections for the Financial Year (FY) 2024-25 register a growth of 22.19% Net Direct Tax collections for FY2024-25 grow at over 20.99% Advance Tax collections for FY2024-25 stood at Rs. 1,48,823 crore with a growth of 27.34% Refunds aggregating to Rs. 53,322 crore issued in the current fiscal The provisional numbers of […]

Delhi ITAT's Order In Case of Sumit Maheshwari Vs ITO

Delhi ITAT Cancels Penalty U/S 271(1)(b) as Tax Notice Sent to Old Address Without Confirmation

In the matter of Sumit Maheshwari vs. Income Tax Officer (ITAT Delhi), the appeal emerged from a penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. The issue was whether the penalty was explained given the possibilities covering the service of notices by […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software