• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Kerala HC: No Income Tax Exemption for Employees on Earned Leave Encashment Without Government Notification

Kerala HC’s Order in the Case of Balan Panicker Ramesh Kumar Vs. Union of India

Kerala High Court ruled that employees cannot claim income tax exemption without government notification fixing the income limit for earned leave salary.

Balan Panicker Ramesh Kumar, an applicant asked for the guidance of the respondent department to examine the income limit for tax purposes on earned leave salary u/s 10AA(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, with retrospective effect. After 2002, no revision of the income limit for exemption on encashment of earned leave salary under Section 10 (10AA)(ii) of the Income Tax Act is there.

The applicants are retired employees of different public sector undertakings and scheduled banks. Before April 1, 2023, all the applicants retired from service.

The same was mentioned for the cases the court posted referring to section (10AA)(ii) of the Income Tax held that “4. It is the prerogative of the Government to fix the limit of income of encashment of earned leave salary for exemption from payment of income tax. Unless the Government issues the notification fixing the limit of income for earned leave salary, an employee cannot claim exemption from payment of income tax on encashment of earned leave up to 300 days.

The last notification was issued on 31.05.2002, and the Government did not thereafter issue a notification despite there having been three pay revisions. The latest notification is only in 2023, wherein the upper limit has been fixed as Rs.25 lakhs, taking the highest salary of the cabinet secretary, i.e., Rs.2.5 lakhs per month.”

The last notification was issued on May 31, 2002, and the government did not issue a notification after that despite there having been three pay revisions. The updated notification is only in 2023, after which the upper limit has been fixed at Rs. 25 lakhs, taking the highest salary of the cabinet secretary, i.e., Rs. 2.5 lakhs per month, a single bench of Justice Murali Purushothaman noted.

Read Also: Patna HC: Govt & Private Employees Can’t Entitled Same Rules for Leave Encashment Exemption

The writ petition has been disposed of by the court with liberty to the applicants to approach the government for the reliefs asked and the government may decide upon their representations.

Case TitleBalan Panicker Ramesh Kumar Vs. Union of India
Case No.WP(C) NO. 3145 OF 2022
Date10.06.2024
Petitioners byKevin Varghese Jacob
Respondents byPremsankar R, T.C. Krishna
Kerala High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software