• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Punjab and Haryana HC Cancels I-T Notice Without Implementing Faceless Assessment U/S 144B

Punjab and Haryana HC's Order In the Case of Shikhar Gadh vs. Income Tax Officer

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana in a case has set aside the income tax notice issued and proceedings initiated without performing the faceless assessment under section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner Shikhar Gadh cited that the problem is pertinent to the existing petition stands examined and concluded by the court titled Jasjit Singh vs. Union of India and others and by the Coordinate Bench in Jatinder Singh Bhangu vs. Union of India and others, decided on 19.07.2024.

The court in the matter carried that these circulars or guidelines by the board can not have been furnished to override the legal provisions or to make them otiose or obsolete. It is crucial for Legislative enactments having financial implications to be followed strictly and mandatorily.

Read Also: What is Faceless Income Tax Assessment & How it Works for Taxpayers?

The authorities through practising the powers had in sections 119 and 120 of the Act, 1961 as well as Section 144B (7 & 8), are not permitted to seize the statutory provisions to their own delight which causes hurdles to the taxpayers. Confusion arises from this among taxpayers.

Learning that the law specified under the coordinate bench the division bench of Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice Sanjay Vashisth marked that the notice issued via the JAO under section 148 of the Act, 1961 and the proceedings initiated after that without performing the faceless assessment as predicts u/s 144B of the Act, 1961, have been discovered to be opposite to the provisions of the Act 1961.

The notices are been set aside by the court. It was viewed by the court that the norms and circulars could be issued merely to supplement the legal provisions and for their execution.

Case TitleShikhar Gadh vs. Income Tax Officer
CitationCWP-31483-2024 (O&M)
Date22.11.2024
Petitioner byMr Chetan Jain, Mr Mahesh Kumar, Mr Anand Chaudhuri
Respondents byMr Saurabh Kapoor, Ms Pridhi Sandhu
Punjab and Haryana High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software