• twitter-icon

Search results for: tax liability

Madras HC's Order in Case of M/s. Jai Maa Engineering Co Vs. The State Tax Officer

10% Pre-Deposit Due to Lack of Evidence: Madras HC Remands GST Liability Order for Reconsideration

The Madras High Court remanded the order validating the GST obligation as of the failure to provide oral or document proof. The case was remanded for reconsideration on 10% pre-deposit. The applicant/taxpayer Jai Maa Engineering Co. has claimed that they were not aware of the proceedings directing to the impugned order since all the communications […]

Madras High Court's Order in the Case of Tvl. K.V.M. Textiles vs. the Deputy State Tax Officer

Madras HC Directs Re-consideration of GST Liability as Sales T.O. Believed to Be 110% of Purchase T.O.

The Madras High Court in a ruling ordered reconsideration of the GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) liability confirmed on proceeding on the assumption that the sales turnover shall be 110% of the purchase turnover. The taxpayer K V M Textiles, claimed that they were not informed of the proceedings, as the show cause […]

Gujarat GST AAR's Order for M/s. Vijai Electricals Ltd.

Gujarat AAR: GST Liability Arises on Advance Amounts Received Against Supply Portion of a Work Contract

The GST is liable to get paid in advance obtained against the supply concerning the work contract, The Gujarat Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled. The turnkey contract entered into by the applicant has been ruled to be a work contract, remarked by the bench of Amit Kumar Mishra and Milind Kavatkar. The petitioner is […]

GST Notification No. 12/2024 – Central Tax for GSTR 3B Table 6.1

CBIC Dept. Updates Table 6.1 of GST Return Form 3B for Adjustments Prior Negative Liability

To include the ‘Adjustment of negative liability of previous tax period’ for Reverse Charge and supplies under Section 9(5) of GST Act and other than Reverse Charge and supplies made under Section 9(5) of GST, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has revised Table 6.1 of the GSTR 3B. From a new […]

Madras HC's Order in Case of Yesem Marketing Vs Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

Madras HC Allows Contesting GST Liability with a 10% Pre-deposit on Non-response to SCN

GST obligation due to non-response to SCN: HC furnishes the opportunity to challenge tax demand on merits with a 10% pre-deposit The Madras HC in a ruling addressed a significant matter by engaging Yesem Marketing and the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer concerning Goods and Services Tax (GST) liability. Based on the allegation of the violation […]

Delhi ITAT's Order in the Case of Suchi Agrawal Versus ITO

Delhi ITAT: Not Compulsory to Submit Form 67 to Avail FTC (Foreign Tax Credit)

The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that submission of Form-67 is not obligatory to claim foreign tax credit (FTC). The bench of Sudhir Pareek (Judicial Member) and S. Rifaur Rahman (Accountant Member) has marked that filing Form-67 is a procedural or directory provision and is not a compulsory requirement. Thus, […]

Madras HC’s Order In Case of M/s.Crystal Granites Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (ST)

Madras HC Orders 10% Pre-Deposit Reconsideration Due to GST Liability Mismatch (GSTR 3B vs GSTR 2A)

A reconsideration of the matter has been ordered by Madras HC on a 10% pre-deposit condition concerned with the mismatch between GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A, following a failure to respond to the Show Cause Notice ( SCN ). The applicant, Crystal Granites contested the order because the show cause notice and the impugned order […]

Hyderabad ITAT's Order In the Case of Jonna Iron Mart Vs. Asstt. C. I. T.

Tax Officials Fail to Verify Sundry Creditors Before Invoking Section 41(1), ITAT Sends Matter to AO

The Hyderabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) remanded the case to the Assessing Officer ( AO ) post remarking that the Income Tax Authorities were unable to discuss the difference in sundry creditors before confirming the addition u/s 41(1) Income Tax Act, 1961. The taxpayer Jonna Iron Mart is a […]

Delhi ITAT’s Order In Case of Late Sh. Mahender Kumar Mittal Vs. Income Tax Officer

ITAT New Delhi: No Addition Under Section 41(1) Without Proof of Liability Cessation

The New Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) carried that unless there is proof to show that the obligation has ceased to exist, no addition under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act is there and therefore, deleted the addition made by Assessing Officer (AO). A petition has been filed by Shashi […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates