• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Non-consideration of GSTR-2A & Reply in Readjudication SCN Case, Delhi HC Cancels Order for Claiming Alleged Excess GST ITC

Delhi HC's Order In Case of Mrishi Marcndey India Ltd Vs Sales Tax Officer

The Delhi High Court in a decision has set aside an order for an alleged excess claim of Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) Input Tax Credit( ITC ) for the FY 2018-2019.

The applicant has contested the order on 15th March 2024 which was issued without regarding the answer furnished via the applicant dated 10th March 2024.

The counsel of the applicant, Parveen Kumar Gambhir, along with Rakesh Kumar and Akul Mangla, claimed that the applicant had furnished proof via Form GSTR-2A, GSTR-8A, and GSTR-9, demonstrating no excess ITC claim. However, this proof was not reviewed by the Proper Officer.

The counsel of the respondent Avishkar Singhvi, ASC, with Shubham Kumar, Naven Ahmed, and Vivek Kumar Singh accepted the notice for the respondents.

Read Also: Delhi HC Orders Re-adjudication to Address the Taxpayer’s Incapability for Responding GST SCN

The Division Bench of Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva and Justice Ravinder Dudeja remarked that we have been taken through Form GSTR-2A, as available on the portal and from it prima facie seems that it has not been inspected by the Proper Officer. Concerning that, we believe that the impugned order calls for a remit.

The Bench of Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva and Justice Ravinder Dudeja set aside the impugned order. The SCN was restored on the file of the proper officer to re-adjudicate as per the statute post investigating the response furnished via the applicant and post-furnishing a chance of the personal hearing before the applicant within the duration stated under section 75(3) of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

The proper Officer had not reviewed the submitted forms. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, the Delhi HC Division Bench revealed.

Case TitleMrishi Marcndey India Ltd Vs Sales Tax Officer
CitationW.P.(C) 6467/2024 & CM APPL. 26953/2024
Date07.05.2024
For PetitionerMs Anjali Jha Manish, Mr Priyadarshi Manish and Ms Divya Rastogi, Advocates
For RespondentAppearance not given
Delhi High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates