• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


ITAT Delhi U/s 44BB Receipts via Foreign Entity From Software Services In India Not Taxable If Absence of PE

Delhi ITAT's Order In Case of Computer Modelling Group Ltd Vs ACIT

Receipts via a foreign entity from the provision of software services to oil companies in India being like business profits are not chargeable in India in the absence of its Permanent Establishment (PE) during the relevant AYs, Delhi ITAT ruled.

Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act includes a unique provision for the calculation of the taxable income of a non-resident taxpayer who is in the business of delivering services or facilities in association with or supplying plant and machinery on hire, used or to be used, in the prospecting for, or extraction or production of, mineral oils.

The Division Bench G.S. Pannu (Vice President) and Astha Chandra (Judicial Member) marked that the impugned receipts of the taxpayer are not levied to tax in India under the provisions of Section 44BB of the Act for the reason that the taxpayer does not have a PE in India in the pertinent AYs under regard and that being a resident of Canada, through the more beneficial provisions under the India-Canada DTAA, the taxpayer is regulated.

Concerning the case the taxpayer, a foreign company and a tax resident of Canada, is in the business of supplying reservoir simulation software to oil companies like ONGC, Oil India, Vedanta, etc. including corresponding software maintenance support services and training services for acquiring the operation of such software.

Under Section 148 the AO issued notice on the foundation that the taxpayer did not file the return for the impugned AYs despite receipts from Indian companies on which TDS had been deducted and concluded that the taxpayer was furnishing products and services which were being used to support exploratory activities in oil and gas exploration and production. Subsequently, the AO applied Section 44BB and calculated the taxpayer’s income at Rs. 36.44 Lac equivalent to 10% of the aggregate receipts of Rs. 3.64 Cr.

On the ruling of the jurisdictional High Court in OHM Ltd. and PGS Exploration, the bench relied on which it was ruled that the presence of a PE is a condition precedent for applicability of Section 44BB.

It is acknowledged particular that the taxpayer does not secure a PE in India and since it is the tax resident of Canada, India-Canada DTAA and nextly noted that Revenue has not carried on record any material to establish to the contrary, Bench remarked.

When the treaty provisions are advantageous, they ought to be applied, as the Bench ruled that section 44BB does not override the provisions of section 90.

The Bench remarked that the AO was unable to carry the record of anything to prove the existence of a taxpayer PE in India and that it is not the case of the Revenue that the taxpayer has the PE in India at the time of the impugned AYs.

Hence the Bench concluded that as the taxpayer does not include a PE in India in the impugned AYs, related receipts do not levy tax u/s 44BB.

The question of treating them as royalty or FTS is not effective as the impugned receipts experience the character of business income, the ITAT asked the AO to grant TDS credit for the tax deducted at source on the impugned receipts and also to grant interest u/s 244A.

Case TitleComputer Modelling Group Ltd Vs. ACIT, Circle International
CitationITA No. 2090/Del/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13
ITA No. 2305/Del/2022 Assessment Year: 2019-20
ITA No. 2091/Del/2023 Assessment Year: 2020-21
ITA No. 3102/Del/2023 Assessment Year: 2021-22
Date03.05.2024
Assessee byShri Manuj Sabharwal, Adv.
Department byShri Vizay B. Vasanta, CIT-DR
Delhi ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Tax Experts

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Best Offer for Tax Professionals

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software