• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Allahabad HC Cancels Petition Challenging GST ITC Reversal on Fake Supplies

Allahabad HC's Order In Case of M/S Rajshi Processors Raebareli Vs State Of U.P.

A petition filed by a firm against the penalty, interest levied on it, and reversal of ITC on inward supplies of goods by non-existent firms has been dismissed by the Allahabad High Court.

The passed order of the additional commissioner in the same concern has been carried by the court.

The court witnessed that the bogus vitiates the solemn proceedings and the particular that the advantage of the input tax credit (ITC) has earlier been allowed to the taxpayer just as the firms were then enrolled shall not be made any estoppel against the council opting the pertinent measure to claim the refund of the advantage incorrectly claimed.

The taxpayer is involved in the manufacturing and sale of aluminium casting and machinery parts and, in a survey of the place of business, it was discovered that it asserted to have received inward supplies via 3 firms and claimed ITC on the same inward supplies.

Post claiming the ITC via the taxpayer, an inquiry was performed via the Special Investigation Branch (SIB) and revealed that the firms from which the taxpayer has claimed to have obtained inward supplies were not in existence and were fake.

The taxpayer furnished that it has actually obtained the inward supplies which is made via records produced to the adjudicating council, and the supplier firms secured the valid GSTIN registration when the same had obtained the supplies.

The taxpayer availed that consequently if the GSTIN registration of the company gets cancelled then his company does not get penalised for it. Just due to the firms enrolled on the transaction date it couldn’t stated that the department is obligated to furnish the ITC advantage before the taxpayer despite the fact that the firms were not in existence and they can not have made the actual supplies, the court stated.

Read Also: Easy Explanation of GST ITC Reversal (Non-Payment 180 Days)

The ruling of the court shows the important need for businesses to encounter genuine transactions when claiming ITC. With this judgment, a strict warning against bogus practices is been carried apart from that it supports the need for stringent compliance with GST statutes.

Case TitleM/S Rajshi Processors Raebareli Vs State Of U.P.
CitationWRIT TAX No. – 128 of 2024
Date14.05.2024
For PetitionerAnurag Mishra
For RespondentC.S.C.
Allahabad High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Tax Experts

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Best Offer for Tax Professionals

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates