• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Madras HC Orders Fresh Hearing for R.B. Traders Due to GST Consultant’s Lapse; 90% of Disputed Tax Paid

Madras HC's Order in the Case of R.B.Traders vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

The Madras High Court in a ruling ordered a fresh hearing for the applicant as the Goods and Service Tax consultant unable to notify for the proceedings and had already filed 90% of the disputed tax amount.

The applicant R.B Traders, has contested an order issued by the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer (Respondent 1) asking to have it quashed since it was allegedly opposite to law.

It was furnished by the applicant that the noticesand communications were uploaded in the “Additional Notices Column” of the GST portal. They were not learn about these notices as a small business entity.

The applicant laid on a consultant for GST compliance who was unable to notify or update them regarding the proceedings which directed to the applicant missing the chance for furnishing a response within the said time.

It was claimed that the impugned order was passed without furnishing a chance for a personal hearing which cited to be a breach of the principles of natural justice. The applicant asserted that they despoted approximately 90% of the tax dues before the authority previously.

The documents and pleadings are analyzed by Justice Krishnan Ramasamy and discovered that the order was furnished without granting a personal hearing therefore breaching the principles of natural justice.

It was marked by the Madras High Court that the applicant has deposited 90% of the disputed tax and carried that it was crucial to furnish the applicant a chance to represent their matter on merits and within the statute.

The impugned orders have been set aside by the court and lifted the attachment order on the bank accounts of the applicant. The court asked the applicant to furnish their reply/objection including the demanded documents to the respondents within 2 weeks from the receipt date of the order of the court. The writ petition was disposed of with the directions.

Case TitleR.B.Traders vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer
CitationW.P.No.25810 of 2024 & W.M.P.Nos.28182 to 28184 of 2024
Date05.09.2024
For PetitionerMr.S.Ramanan
For RespondentsMs.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran
Madras High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates