• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


GST | Bank Account Attached Without Thinking Assessee’s View: Kerala HC Sends Matter for Re-adjudication

Kerala HC's Order In Case of A.M Sainudheen Vs Commercial Tax Officer

The matter for re-adjudication is remanded by the Kerala High Court as the attachment of the bank account under Goods and Service Tax ( GST ) proceedings without regarding the taxpayer’s opinion. The applicant has approached the Court with the recovery notice demanding arrears of tax.

A M Sainudheen, the applicant is a taxpayer under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act/State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 having TIN No.3230498362. SCN was issued before the applicant via the 2nd respondent asking for an amount of Rs.57,553 concerning the AY 2005-06 and 200809.

The SCN is been challenged by the petitioner before the Court by filing a writ petition and the court vide judgment and order disposed of the stated writ petition asking the 1st respondent therein to regard and pass suitable orders on the representation of the petitioner.

In pursuance of the decision and order the representation furnished via the applicant came to be decided vide order and the competent authority determined the obligation and interest at Rs.2,033/- and Rs.1,423/-, respectively.

Read Also:- Kerala HC Directs Govt to Open GSTN Portal for Filing GST Return, Order from GSTAT

The petitioner has approached the Court with the recovery notice requesting arrears of tax of Rs.88,476/- for the years 200506, 2008-09, and 2012-13.

Against the said notice the applicant has represented specifying that the applicant has paid the arrears before concerning the AY 2005-06 and 2008-09 and that the excess amount filed via him may be refunded to him.

Petitioner’s counsel said that without acknowledging the contention of the applicant vide order the petitioner’s Bank account has been attached.

While permitting the plea, the Court comprising Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh set aside the impugned order and remanded the case back to the State Tax Officer, third respondent to regard the representation of the applicant and pass fresh orders.

Case TitleA.M Sainudheen Vs Commercial Tax Officer
Case Number:- WP(C) NO. 10787 OF 2024
Date19.03.2024
Other Present:Smt.jasmin M.M.-GP
Kerala High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates