• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Kerala HC: Order Not Liable to Pay Late Fee U/S 234E for Filing Delayed TDS Returns

Kerala HC's Order for the Sutheepan Sowmini

The Kerala High Court invalidated the intimation order issued under the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding the imposition of late fees under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the delayed submission of previous Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) returns.

The petitioner, Sutheepan Sowmini, contested the notice related to the late fees imposed under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, specifically for the late filing of previous TDS returns for the assessment year 2013-2014.

The argument in this writ petition is that the demand notices are not within the jurisdiction’s scope. Late fees cannot be imposed for failing to file previous returns for the period before June 1, 2015.

The petitioner’s Counsel also argued that the impugned demand notices have been released concerning a period before June 1, 2015, for the assessment year 2013-2014. The petitioner’s Counsel also referenced the Kerala High Court’s judgment in the case of M/s Olari Little Flower Kuries Pvt Ltd. vs. Union of India to rely on.

In the M/s Olari Little Flower Kuries Pvt Ltd. vs. Union of India decision, the writ petitioner challenged an intimation received under Section 200 A from the Revenue, which demanded late fees for the delayed submission of quarterly TDS statements. The Kerala High Court noted that the notices were relevant to periods before June 1, 2015, and therefore allowed the writ petition, setting aside the intimation concerning the filing of delayed statements before June 1, 2015.

The bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh stated that the petitioner’s concerns align with the aforementioned Division Bench judgment, and thus, the Writ Petition is granted. The challenged orders in Ext. P1 to Ext. P6 (the intimation orders) are hereby nullified.

K.N. Sreekumaran represented the petitioner, and Christopher Abraham served as the Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department.

Case TitleSutheepan Sowmini Vs. Income Tax Officers
CitationWP(C) NO. 29120 OF 2023
Date05.09.2023
By Advs.K.N.sreekumaran
P.J.anilkumar (A-1768)
N.Santhoshkumar
Kerala High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Tax Experts

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Best Offer for Tax Professionals

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software