• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


ITAT Bengaluru Addresses ₹1.23 Lakh Tax Demand Caused by Consultant’s Wrong Tax Regime Selection

Bangalore ITAT Order in The Case of Adit Nilesh Shah Vs the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore Bench, ruled that due to an error made by the tax consultant, the income tax return was processed under the old tax regime. As a result, the tribunal allowed the appeal. The taxpayer was facing a demand of INR 1.23 lakh.

The taxpayer, Mr. Shah from Ali Asker Road, Bengaluru, submitted his ITR under the new tax regime and reported a total income of Rs 32.55 lakh. However, Mr Shah’s consultant had inadvertently submitted Form No. 10-IEA, which opted him out of the new tax regime.

The taxpayer-appellant said that this was a mistake by his consultant during routine compliance operations and was not intentional. The ITR of Mr Shah indicates his decision to remain in the new tax regime instead of the old one.

This ITR was processed by the Centralised Processing Centre (CPC), Bengaluru, under the old tax regime on January 29, 2026. With this, the applicant was liable to Rs 1.23 lakh in additional tax. The Commissioner of Appeals (CITA) dismissed all claims to nullify this mistake of the consultant, because of which the present appeal was before the ITAT.

Also Read: New Tax Regime (U/S 115BAC) Process in Gen IT Software

Mr Varun S, the counsel, represented Mr Shah and won this case. The tribunal assessed Mr Shah’s conduct and the filed ITR to verify the legitimacy of his choice to remain under the new tax regime. The tribunal said that the ITR is a statutory document through which a taxpayer reports income and estimates tax payable and the regime. In Akshay Nitin Malu v. ITO (2025), reliance was placed.

Subsequently, the order of the CIT(A) was quashed, and the AO was asked to process the return u/s 115BAC(1A) to recompute the tax liability. ITAT, Section 202(4) of the Income Tax Act, 2025, read together with Rule 136 of the Income Tax Rules, 2026, provides the option to choose the Old Tax Regime.

Case TitleAdit Nilesh Shah Vs the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Case No.ITA 2152/BANG/2026
For PetitionerShri. Varun S AR
For RespondentSri. Ganesh R Gale, Standing
Counse for Department
Bangalore ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.
View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Tax Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Offer in 2026

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software