• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Madras HC: Reminder Notice Mandatory Before Ex-Parte GST Order U/S 169

Madras HC's Order In Case of M/s. Pioneer Products vs The State Tax Officer (FAC)

The tax authority should send at least one reminder notice via Registered Post Acknowledgement Due (RPAD) or any other valid mode as specified u/s 169 of the GST (Goods and Services Tax ) Act, the Madras High Court ruled before passing an ex-parte order.

Justice Krishnan Ramasamy, on June 11, 2025, furnished the ruling quashed the assessment order on January 9, 2025, passed by the State Tax Officer (FAC).

The applicant, M/s Pioneer Products, ruled that as the notices along with DRC-01 and personal hearing communications were uploaded in the “Additional Notices and Orders” tab of the GST portal, they were neither visible in the primary “Notices and Orders” section nor furnished via physical modes such as RPAD. Consequently, the applicant stayed clueless about the proceedings and could not submit a response or appear for a hearing.

The only uploading of the notices to the GST portal without any attempt to reach the taxpayer via physical service weakens the requirement of due process, the HC cited.

“When an ex-parte order is passed, the respondent should have sent at least one reminder notice through RPAD or by way of any other mode as specified under Section 169 of the Act,” the Court cited.

The contested assessment ruling has been rejected by the Madras HC and sent the case before the assessing authority for review, considering the applicant’s offer to file 25% of the contested tax.

There are three weeks for the applicant from the date of order receipt to deposit 25% of the contested tax, the court mentioned. 2 weeks are there for the applicant from the date of the deposit to furnish a thorough answer along with all supporting documentation.

After that, the respondent authority should provide the applicant a 14-day notice period for a personal hearing, and only after that, they may issue a new assessment order as per law.

Case TitleM/s. Pioneer Products vs The State Tax Officer (FAC)
Case No.W.P.No.20594 of 2025
W.M.P.Nos.23209, 23211 & 23212 of 2025
For PetitionerMr.J.Madhusuthanan
For RespondentMrs.P.Selvi Government Advocate
Madras High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Big Offer on All Software

Powering India’s Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Tax Offer 2025

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates