• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Delhi ITAT: Addition of ₹26.35 Lakh Disallowed, Revenue’s Acceptance of Books

Delhi ITAT's Order in the Case of Shivinder Pal Singh Chahal vs. ACIT, Circle 43(1)

The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has removed the INR 26.35 lakh addition made to cash deposits during the demonetization period, marking that the Revenue Department had accepted the sales and purchases without rejecting the books of accounts.

The taxpayer/applicant, Shivinder Pal Singh, appealed against the order on 26.10.2023 for the Assessment Year(AY) 2017-18 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)[CIT(A)].

The issues involved adding Rs 26,35,000 to the cash deposits made during the demonetization period. The assessing officer discovered that such sales were much higher than in the other periods and added the taxable amount.

The addition was kept by the CIT(A), and the taxpayer appealed to the tribunal, dissatisfied with the CIT(A) order.

Rewrite Title: ITAT Delhi Upholds Deletion of INR 6.80 Crore Addition U/S 69C for Alleged Bogus Purchases

The records are been reviewed by the two-member bench comprising Sudhir Pareek (Judicial Member) and Shamim Yahya (Accountant Member), and marked that the revenue department has accepted the sales and purchases without rejecting the books. As the disallowance was unexplained, it asked for its deletion and permitted the plea on the same issue.

The additional problem engaged in the addition of Rs 7,52,667 because of the distinction in he reported purchases in the ITR and the import export data from the Central Board of Excise and Customs(CBEC). The explanation was been rejected by the AO and incurred an addition, which has been kept by the CIT(A). The taxpayer appealed to the tribunal.

The records are been reviewed by the tribunal, and it was discovered that the difference of Rs. 7,52,667/- in purchases stayed unreconciled because of the absence of a credible elaboration. As the addition was explained, therefore, it kept the order of CIT(A) and dismissed the plea on the same issue.

The filed plea of the taxpayer was partly permitted.

Case TitleShivinder Pal Singh Chahal vs. ACIT, Circle 43(1)
CitationITA NO. 3248/Del/2023
Date22.01.2025
Appellant byShri Harshit Chauhan
Represented byShri Sahil Kumar Bansal
Delhi ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Big Offer on All Software

Empowering Experts in India’s Taxation Industry

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Tax Offer 2025

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software