• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Gauhati HC Order to Reduce GST on Fruit Drinks from 28% to 12%

Gauhati HC's Order in The Case of X'SS Beverage CO. vs The State of Assam

The Gauhati High Court ruled that juice-based carbonated drinks should be taxed at 12% GST instead of the previously high 28% imposed by tax authorities. As a result, consumers may see a decrease in the cost of their preferred beverages.

The decision arrives as a big win for X’SS Beverage, a manufacturer of carbonated juice drinks, which had been battling a tax demand that contained penalties and interest.

It was claimed by the GST officials that as the drinks carry carbonated water, they must be taxed at a higher rate subjected to the soft drinks.

The X’SS beverage kept fruit juice as the predominant ingredient, giving the drinks their essential character and making them eligible for the lower tax rate.

The high court directed to the Rules for Interpretation of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, which state that if a product does not conform neatly into a single category, it should be classified based on its essential nature. It also mentioned scientific principles and past judicial rulings, including a case involving Parle Agro’s Appy Fizz.

It was mentioned by legal experts mentioned that the ruling will provide a significant precedent. Only a few adverse rulings are there on the classification of carbonated fruit drinks.

In the same case, the HC has looked at all the major aspects like the ingredients, their proportion and role in manufacture, common parlance of the product, how the products are marketed, their label, etc., to decide the classification and, consequently, a lower GST rate.

Read Also: Gauhati High Court Upholds Validity of CGST Rule 36(4) on GST ITC Claims

Via the same judgement, Fruit pulp and juice-based carbonated drinks now have a tax advantage, making them more inexpensive for consumers and providing relief to manufacturers facing high taxation.

Case TitleX’SS Beverage CO. vs The State of Assam
CitationW.P. (C) NO. 5347/2022
Date04.03.2025
For the PetitionersMr. A. Saraf, Mr. P.K. Bora
For the Represented byMr. B. Gogoi
Gauhati High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Big Offer on All Software

Empowering Experts in India’s Taxation Industry

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Tax Offer 2025

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates