• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Punjab & Haryana HC: GSTIN of Buyers in GSTR-1 Form Cannot Be Corrected After the Limitation Period

Punjab & Haryana HC's Order in the Case of Bar Code India Limited vs. Union of India and others

In the case of Bar Code India Limited vs Union of India, the Punjab & Haryana High Court ruled that corrections to a purchaser’s GST number in the GSTR-1 return cannot be made after the limitation period has expired. The court emphasized that errors by a company, causing financial loss to another, do not initiate an interpretation of the law to allow such mistakes.

Bar Code India Limited, the petitioner, issued invoices to the purchaser during the financial year 2021–2022. However, the petitioner company made errors in its GSTR-1 filing by incorrectly identifying the point of sale as Mumbai instead of Delhi and using the GST number of the purchaser in Mumbai instead of in Delhi.

The petitioner claimed they became aware of the errors in April 2023 when the purchaser informed them about difficulties in claiming input tax credit.

As a result, the purchaser denied the payments for other invoices. In response, the petitioner wrote to the department on August 18, 2023, requesting permission to amend their GSTR-1 for three invoices dated May 13, 2021. However, the department denied the request, citing the absence of a provision to amend returns after the prescribed deadline.

The court explained that the GST filing process involves a matching mechanism detailed in Sections 37 and 38 of the GST Act, after which it will generate Form GSTR-3 for returns submission. After it is submitted, any rectifications may have long-term impacts.

T Errors or omissions can only be corrected during the initial stages of filing GSTR-1 or GSTR-3, as subsequent changes could attract long-term hurdles on the system. The exemption given particularly for GSTR-3 is different than the one given in pre-GST stages. And it does not have the law to auto-fill data and entries.

Once a supplier files GSTR-1 with details of invoices (place of sale and the GSTR number), the system auto-generates GSTR-2A for the recipient, which forms the criteria for claiming input tax credit in GSTR-3B.

As per Section 16(4) of the GST Act, a GST-registered person cannot claim input tax credit beyond the due date for filing the return under Section 39 for September following the end of the relevant financial year for which these invoices or debit notes are relevant to for the annual return, whichever comes earlier.

The division bench, comprising Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice Sanjay Vashisth, noted that even if the petitioner is permitted to amend the return, it would not automatically enable the purchaser to claim the input tax credit.

The court observed that if the error had been identified before the filing of the annual return, it could have been corrected in GSTR-1 for the relevant month. The portal allows such corrections only until the annual return is filed.

The court also held that businesses are expected to be well-versed with legal provisions, including the given deadlines. It rejected the argument that the law should be adjusted to accommodate errors by businesses, especially since both companies involved have been operating for a considerable time.

The writ petition was dismissed because it lacked merit. The court reiterated that the provisions of the GST Act cannot be altered to benefit a company due to its own mistakes.

Case TitleBar Code India Limited vs. Union of India and Others
CitationCWP No. 25343 of 2023 (O&M)
Date14.11.2024
Petitioner ByMr. Simarpal Sawhney, Mr. Rahul Makkar
Respondents ByMr. Ajay Kalra
Punjab and Haryana High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Narendra Kumar
Narendra Kumar is an experienced technical content writer with expertise in writing and crafting long-form content on subjects such as taxation, business, marketing, and technology. With a passion for deep research and putting his unique ideas into his work, Naren consistently delivers high-quality content that captivates readers. At SAG Infotech, he writes news articles on topics related to GST, finance, and taxation. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates