Site iconSite icon SAG Infotech Official Tax Blog Upto 20% Off on Tax Software for You

Patna HC Upholds GST Registration Cancellation, Emphasizes Timely Use of Legal Remedies

Patna HC's Order In Case of M/S Rani Enterprises vs. The Union of India

A writ petition has been dismissed by the Patna High Court contesting the cancellation of GST registration, quoting that statutory remedies should be pursued within the said time limit.

Chief Justice K. Vinod Chandran and Justice Partha Sarthy noted that “The law favours the diligent and not the indolent”.

Rani Enterprises the applicant challenged the cancellation order on December 30, 2022, after failing to use the statutory appellate mechanisms furnished under the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (BGST Act).

An appeal under section 107 of the Bihar GST Act, against the cancellation order can have been submitted in 3 months, with an additional one-month window for delay condonation.

The applicant does not submit the appeal via the extended due date of April 29, 2023. Additionally, section 30 of the GST Act permitted an application to revoke the cancellation within 30 days of the order. Even after these provisions the applicant neither submitted a plea nor asked for the revocation within the allowable period.

The government adding to this lapse has introduced an Amnesty Scheme through GST Circular No. 3 of 2023, permitting dealers whose registrations were cancelled to restore their status by clearing dues between March 31, 2023, and August 31, 2023. Also, the applicant loses to take this opportunity.

It was noted by the court that at the time of the cancellation of the period the applicant was not a registered dealer and no process is there to track their business activities. The absence of tracking has raised issues regarding the feasibility of transactions performed in the interrupted period.

Also Read: Delhi HC Cancels SCN and GSTIN Cancellation Order as It Was ‘Remarkably Silent’ on GST Provisions

The Court repeating the principle that “the law favours the diligent and not the indolent,” concluded that the failure of the applicant within the said timelines prevented them from asking for relief. Therefore the writ petition was dismissed.

Case TitleM/S Rani Enterprises vs. The Union of India
CitationCivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15878 of 2024
Date22.10.2024
For the PetitionerMr Dinesh Choudhary, Ms Madhumala Kumari
For the RespondentMr Dr K.N. Singh, Mr Anshuman Singh, Mr Devansh Shankar, Mr Shivaditya Dhari Sinha
Patna High CourtRead Order
Exit mobile version