• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Patna HC Upholds GST Registration Cancellation, Emphasizes Timely Use of Legal Remedies

Patna HC's Order In Case of M/S Rani Enterprises vs. The Union of India

A writ petition has been dismissed by the Patna High Court contesting the cancellation of GST registration, quoting that statutory remedies should be pursued within the said time limit.

Chief Justice K. Vinod Chandran and Justice Partha Sarthy noted that “The law favours the diligent and not the indolent”.

Rani Enterprises the applicant challenged the cancellation order on December 30, 2022, after failing to use the statutory appellate mechanisms furnished under the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (BGST Act).

An appeal under section 107 of the Bihar GST Act, against the cancellation order can have been submitted in 3 months, with an additional one-month window for delay condonation.

The applicant does not submit the appeal via the extended due date of April 29, 2023. Additionally, section 30 of the GST Act permitted an application to revoke the cancellation within 30 days of the order. Even after these provisions the applicant neither submitted a plea nor asked for the revocation within the allowable period.

The government adding to this lapse has introduced an Amnesty Scheme through GST Circular No. 3 of 2023, permitting dealers whose registrations were cancelled to restore their status by clearing dues between March 31, 2023, and August 31, 2023. Also, the applicant loses to take this opportunity.

It was noted by the court that at the time of the cancellation of the period the applicant was not a registered dealer and no process is there to track their business activities. The absence of tracking has raised issues regarding the feasibility of transactions performed in the interrupted period.

Also Read: Delhi HC Cancels SCN and GSTIN Cancellation Order as It Was ‘Remarkably Silent’ on GST Provisions

The Court repeating the principle that “the law favours the diligent and not the indolent,” concluded that the failure of the applicant within the said timelines prevented them from asking for relief. Therefore the writ petition was dismissed.

Case TitleM/S Rani Enterprises vs. The Union of India
CitationCivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15878 of 2024
Date22.10.2024
For the PetitionerMr Dinesh Choudhary, Ms Madhumala Kumari
For the RespondentMr Dr K.N. Singh, Mr Anshuman Singh, Mr Devansh Shankar, Mr Shivaditya Dhari Sinha
Patna High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates