• twitter-icon

Search results for: section 54

Patna HC's Order in The Case of Binay Rice Mill vs. State of Bihar

Patna HC: Adjudicating Authority Must Examine Appellant’s Material Before Passing GST Order

The Patna High Court recently annulled decisions made by the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Adjudicating and Appellate Authorities. This action was taken due to the authorities’ oversight in not adequately considering the evidence presented by the appellant to support their claim. Binay Rice Mill, operating under the name Sharda Ram Industries and led by […]

Rajasthan HC's Order in The Case of Shree Arihant Oil and General Mills vs. Union Of India

Rajasthan HC Quashes GST Circular 181/2022 Restricting ITC Refunds Before 18 July 2022

The Rajasthan High Court has annulled Point No. 2 of Circular No. 181/13/2022-GST, issued on November 10, 2022. This specific point restricted the claims for Input Tax Credit (ITC) related to the inverted duty structure for transactions made before July 18, 2022. A bench comprising Justices Dinesh Mehta and Sangeeta Sharma observed that the clarification […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order in The Case of Payal Kishore Kulchandani vs. Income Tax Officer

Mumbai ITAT Allows LTCG Exemption on Sale of Old Flat with Timely Possession of New Property

The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) permitted the claim of Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) exemption u/s 54 of the Income Tax Act,1961 on the sale of an old flat, as the possession of the new flat was received within the specified period. The taxpayer, Payal Kishore Kulchandani, submitted her return reporting […]

Patna HC's Order in The Case of M/S Sai Steel vs. The State of Bihar

Patna HC: GST Refund Limitation to Be Computed from Date of Correct Tax Payment

The limitation for GST refund claimed under the wrong head ceases to apply from the date of correct payment, the Patna High Court has ruled. After reading Section 77 of the CGST Act, 2017, read with Section 19 of the IGST Act, Justices Rajeev Ranjan Prasad and Shailendra Singh viewed that the date of counting […]

Sikkim HC's Order for In the Case of SICPA India Private Limited and Another V/S Union of India and Others

Sikkim HC Allows INR 4.37 Crore Tax Refund on Unutilized GST ITC After Business Closure

Under the Goods and Services Tax (GST), a business entity can claim a refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) even after it has been terminated. The court has ordered a refund of the unused GST ITC amounting to ₹4.37 crore. The bench of Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai observed that “in the instant matter there […]

Delhi HC's Order In Case of M/S JVG Technology Private Limited vs Commissioner CGST

Delhi HC Orders GST Dept to Release Tax Refund if No Appeal Is Filed Against Appellate Authority’s Order

The Delhi High Court has ordered the tax department to promptly release a refund related to the GST Input Tax Credit (ITC), along with interest. The court decided that the refund should not be delayed because there was no ongoing appeal or hold on the last decision made by the Appellate Authority, which authorised the […]

SC's Order In Case of Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes vs. Gemini Edibles and Fats India Limited

SC Rejects GST Commissioner’s Plea, Refuses to Interfere with AP HC Ruling on ITC Mismatch Refunds

A batch of Special Leave Petitions filed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes has been dismissed by the Supreme Court of India, refusing to interfere with the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s decision, which clarified the availability of GST ITC refunds in cases of mismatches in the tax credit ledger. The applicant, Gemini Edibles and […]

Jharkhand HC's Order in The Case of M/s. BLA Infrastructure Private Limited vs The State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC: Rejection of GST Refund Claim for Statutory Pre-Deposit on Limitation Grounds is Invalid

In a ruling, the Jharkhand High Court determined that denying a claim for a refund of a regulatory pre-deposit made under Section 107(6)(b) of the GST Act is not legally sustainable if the claim was submitted after the two-year limitation period outlined in Section 54(1). The Division Bench comprising Chief Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao and Justice […]

Madras HC's Order in The Case of M/s.Gillette Diversified Operations Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner of GST and Central Excise

Madras HC: GST Refund Claim Cannot Be Denied Based on Retrospective Application of Rule 90(3) Proviso

Discovering that the GST refund claim was filed within 2 years from the “relevant date” as specified in Explanation 2(a) to Section 54(14) of the CGST Act, the Madras High Court clarified that a refund claim cannot be refused based on the retrospective operation of the Proviso to Rule 90(3) of the CGST Rules. The […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates