• twitter-icon

Search results for: Kolkata ITAT

Ahmedabad ITAT's Order in Case of Gujarat Safety Council Vs. ITO

Ahmedabad ITAT: Accumulation Income Can Be Used to Buy Fixed Assets Under Income Tax Section 11(6)

The petition of the taxpayer ruling has been permitted by the Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which collected income could be applied to the acquisition of the fixed assets u/s 11(6) of the Income Tax Act,1961. Gujarat Safety Council, the appellant-assessee, was a trust that led safety training programs. It filed a […]

Calcutta HC's Order In Case of West Bengal Welfare Society Vs CIT

Calcutta HC Upholds ITAT’s Order, Ruling Assessee Eligible for Reg. Within Six Months U/S 80G(5)(iii)

In its recent decision, the Calcutta High Court upheld a ruling by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) allowing an assessee to seek registration under section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 after the initiation of the activity. The revenue department filed a petition under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, disputing […]

Cuttack ITAT's Order in Case of M/s Harichandanpur LAMPS Vs ITO

Cuttack ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) for Reassessment of Non-Compliance and Evaluation of Evidence

The Cuttack bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in a case has remanded the petition via the taxpayer against the commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) order after condoning a 69-day delay. It was remarked by the tribunal that the non-compliance and the absence of documentation in the order of the CIT (Appeals) furnished […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order In Case of Jignesh Chimanlal Jobanputra vs ITO

ITAT Mumbai: IT Addition Can’t Be Deleted Solely Due to Erroneous Section Mention

The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that the addition could not be deleted for the only cause that the section under which the addition is made is cited incorrectly and that it is essential to look into the merits of the case. The bench of Anikesh Banerjee (Judicial Member) and Padmavathy […]

Mumbai ITAT Order for Meyer Organics Pvt Ltd

Mumbai ITAT Directs Authority to Delete Penalty U/S 271(1)(c) for Bona Fide Mistakes 

In the matter of Meyer Organics Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT, the Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) furnished an important decision for levying the penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The ruling of the tribunal is on the correction of bona fide glitches in the original return in the assessment proceedings. Detailed […]

Mumbai ITAT’s Order for M/S BBH Communications India Private Limited

Difference in P&L Account and 26AS Due to Declaration of Amount, Mumbai ITAT Upholds Deletion of Addition

The decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT (A)) is upheld by the Mumbai ITAT to annul an addition made, quoting a discrepancy between Form 26AS and the Profit & Loss Account, attributable to the declaration of service tax amounts. On 27/11/2012 when the assessee filed its income tax return the case appeared, […]

Delhi ITAT's Order for GSR Industries

Delhi ITAT: Taxation Should be Calculated As Per Actual Income Rather Than Theoretical

In a ruling that has captured the attention of tax professionals and businesses alike, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Delhi furnished its verdict on the case between GSR Industries and the Deputy Director of Income Tax (DDIT). This case judged dated 26 December 2023, rotates about diverse problems related to income tax assessment […]

Kolkata ITAT's Order In Case of Indian Chamber of Commerce Versus DCIT

ITAT: ICC is Eligible to Claim Tax Exemption In Respect of Receiving from Conferences & Seminars

The Indian Chamber of Commerce (ICC) is qualified to claim exemption concerning its complete receipts the Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled. Rajesh Kumar (Accountant Member) has noted that the Indian Chamber of Commerce (ICC) does not engage in organizing meetings, seminars, and conferences for business purposes. Instead, these activities are […]

Kolkata CESTAT's Order for Shri. Rajeshwar Prasad Choudhari

CESTAT Kolkata Rejects Tax Demand, No Verification By Dept for the Amount Noted in Form 26AS

The demand for Service Tax only based on form 26 AS given via the income tax department has been set aside by the Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The Appellant, Shri. Rajeshwar Prasad Choudhari contested the impugned order passed through the Commissioner (Appeals), CGST & CX Ranchi, wherein […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software