• twitter-icon

Search results for: 74

2 GST Notice to Patanjali Group Companies

Patanjali Ayurved and Patanjali Foods Ltd Receive GST Notices Due to Non-payment and Wrong ITC

New trouble has emerged for Patanjali Group companies led by Baba Ramdev. Directorate General for GST Intelligence (DGGI) is comprehended to have issued two show-cause notices to Patanjali Group companies Patanjali Ayurved and Patanjali Foods. As per the sources, DGGI (Directorate General for GST Intelligence) has sent 2 SCN before Patanjali group companies Patanjali Ayurved […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order In Case of Jignesh Chimanlal Jobanputra vs ITO

ITAT Mumbai: IT Addition Can’t Be Deleted Solely Due to Erroneous Section Mention

The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that the addition could not be deleted for the only cause that the section under which the addition is made is cited incorrectly and that it is essential to look into the merits of the case. The bench of Anikesh Banerjee (Judicial Member) and Padmavathy […]

Madras HC's Order in the Case Of Tvl. Kavinkumar Textiles V/s Deputy State Tax Officer-I, O/O the Assistant Commissioner

Madras HC Remands Case for Reconsideration: Disparity in GST Returns Ignored Despite Timely Payment

The Madras High Court ordered a reconsideration of the case about the timely payment of Goods and Services Tax (GST) dues, especially addressing differences between Goods and Services Tax Returns (GSTR) 1 and GSTR 3B. This order complied with the observation of the court that even after recognizing the prompt payment of GST dues, the […]

CBDT Begins Drive to Clear 0.54 Million Tax Appeals

CBDT Starts Drive to Tackle Backlog of 0.54M Tax Appeals

As of January 31 this year, a staggering 5,44,205 petitions awaited resolution within the norms of the Income Tax Department, with an additional 63,246 declining at different levels of appellate authorities including Income Tax Appellate Tribunals (ITATs), High Courts, and the Supreme Court. Despite the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) obligation to expedite proceedings, […]

Madras HC's Orde In Case of Vadim Infrastructure Private Limited Vs Commercial Tax Officer

Turnover Discrepancy in GSTR 3B and Form 26AS: Madras HC Rejects Tax Demand Order on Condition

Duplication Found in Turnover Reconciliation and GSTR 3B and Form 26AS: Madras HC sets aside GST Demand Order on Pre-deposit Condition The Petitioner, Vadim Infrastructure Private Limited, is in engineering and construction services, contested the assessment order on 31.12.2023 and is assailed on the grounds of violation of principles of natural justice. The major observations […]

Delhi HC's Order In Case of Fresenius Medical Care India Pvt. Ltd. v/s Union of India & ORS

Delhi HC Sets 5% IGST Rate on the Import of Dialysis Machines

The Delhi High Court has awarded relief of as low as 5% Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) towards importing dialysis machines by Fresenius Medical Care India Private Limited (FMC India). Dialysis machines covered under HSN Codes 9018 and 9031 are exposed to be taxed at 5%, essentially awarding a significant rebate of 7% on […]

Mumbai CESTAT's Order for Kanakia Spaces Reality Pvt. Ltd.

CESTAT Mumbai Permits Refund of Service Tax on Canceled Flat Bookings

The refund of service tax paid on cancelled bookings of flats has been permitted by the Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). According to Rule 66E(b)(sic) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, in construction services, service tax is needed to be filed on the amount obtained from the buyers for […]

Madras HC's Order for Ravikumar

Late ITR Filing Delays TDS Refund: Madras HC Instructs to Submit Application U/S 119(2)

An application under Section 119(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed by the Madras High Court to be submitted related to the refund of TDS related to compensation from a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). The delay in filing Income Tax Returns (ITRs) had impeded this process. The applicant for the case asks for […]

Chennai ITAT's Order for Nammalvar Lingusamy

Chennai ITAT: A Massive Amount of Sale Receipt Reflect as Violative in Section 269SS, Impose Tax Penalty U/S 271D

The Chennai ITAT said that receipt of sale consideration of a massive amount of Rs. 1.60 Crores in cash, which is, in breach of the provisions of section 269SS (this section restricts cash receipts over & above twenty thousand) of the Income-tax Act, rightly merits the imposition of penalty under section 271D. The Bench of […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Tax Experts

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates