• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Madras HC Overturns Demand Order as GST Notices Were Only Uploaded on Portal, Denying Hearing Opportunity

Madras HC’s Order in Case of Glamourose Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer

The Madras High Court in a ruling set aside the GST demand order because of a lack of chance of hearing on a pre-deposit condition as the applicant lost to take part in the proceedings because of the lack of awareness of the notices issued.

A writ petition has been filed by the applicant GLAMOUROSE contesting the orders on the foundation that the applicant was not given a reasonable chance to argue the tax demand on merits. It asserted that show cause notice (SCN) and the additional communications were merely uploaded on the GST portal and not communicated to the applicant via any other mode, the current writ petition was filed.

The counsel of the applicant claimed that provided a chance, the applicant can elaborate on the differences between the GSTR 3B return and the GSTR 1 statement. Also, the applicant cited the willingness to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for the remand.

Via issuing a notice in Form ASMT 10 dated July 31, 2023 principles of natural justice were complied with, on September 26, 2023, an SCN and personal hearing notice on the identical date, counsel of the respondent argued.

The bench of Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy marked that the tax proposal, which concentrated on the disparity between the applicant’s GSTR 3B return and GSTR 1 statement, was confirmed because of the non-answering of the applicant to the show cause notice. Due to unawareness, the applicant is not able to take part in the proceedings, the applicant argued.

The court decided to set aside the order and remand the case for reconsideration. The same decision was contingent on the applicant remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand within 2 weeks from the receipt of a copy of the order. The applicant was authorized to submit a response to the SCN within this period.

Read Also: An Informative Guide to GST Portal for Taxpayers and Cos

For the applicant Mr R. Saravanan appeared, and for the respondents Mr V. Prashanth Kiran, Govt. Adv. (T) appeared.

Case TitleGlamourose Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer
Criminal PetitionWrit Petition No.14843 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.16093 & 16096 of 2024
Date14.06.2024
For PetitionerMr.R.Saravanan
For RespondentMr.V.Prashanth Kiran
Madras High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates