• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Madras HC: Late GSTR-3B Filing Not Grounds to Deny GST ITC Post CGST Act Amendment

Madras HC's Order In Case of Ms Shanker Impexx vs. The Assistant Commissioner

The High Court of Madras quashed the refusal of the GST Input Tax Credit (ITC) for late filing of GSTR-3B, mentioning the retrospective revision to the Central Goods and Services Tax(CGST) Act,2017.

The applicant, Shanker Impexx, had contested the order passed by the first respondent dated 19.04.2023. The counsel of the petitioner said that the issue had already been settled by the Court in a batch of writ petitions, including W.P. No. 25081 of 2024, dated 17.10.2024, and requested the same relief.

The Government Pleader validated that the case was covered by the previous decision.

It was marked by Justice Krishnan Ramasamy that the problem raised in this writ petition has been addressed previously in a batch of petitions, along with W.P. No. 25081 of 2024, decided on 17.10.2024.

In that case, the bench noted that the applicants had submitted their GSTR-1 returns at the said time; they cannot submit GSTR-3B because of genuine issues such as financial problems during the COVID-19 lockdown, health problems, and fire accidents. Consequently, they forgot the due date to claim the ITC, which resulted in the reversal of their claims and asked for tax, interest and penalty.

Subsequently, founded on the 53rd GST Council Meeting carried on 22.06.2024, the government extended the last date to claim ITC for FYs 2017-18 to 2020-21 to 30.11.2021. This shift was provided retrospective effect via the Finance Act (No. 2) of 2024 and also explained by official notifications and circulars.

Considering such developments, the court quashed the previous orders and asked the department not to proceed on the problem of limitation and ordered the de-freezing of bank accounts. It also permitted the refund or adjustment of any amount that has been recovered previously.

The bench permitted the Writ Petition on the same lines as the present case concerned the same problem.

Case TitleM/s Shanker Impexx vs. The Assistant Commissioner
CitationW.P.No.9196 of 2024
Date27.02.2025
Counsel For AppellantM/s.Ramya Krishnan
Counsel for RespondentMr T.N.C.Kaushik
Madras High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Big Offer on All Software

Powering India’s Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Tax Offer 2025

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates