• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Madras HC: GST Appeal Can’t Be Denied for Failing to Upload Legal Documents on Portal Due to Technical Errors

Madras HC's Order In Case of M/s.Shivpad Engineers Pvt. Ltd vs. The Deputy Commissioner (ST)

The Madras High Court mentioned that an appeal cannot be rejected only because of the failure to upload documents on the GST portal if the delay or failure is from technical errors on the portal.

The Bench of Justice Krishnan Ramasamy noted that “… an appeal should not be rejected without allowing the parties to be heard, particularly when the rejection arises from technical issues beyond their control.”

Case Facts of M/s.Shivpad Engineers Pvt

The taxpayer filed an appeal manually to the appellate authority. But even after having all the important documents the taxpayer was not able to upload the soft copy of the appeal on the GST portal because of technical issues. Consequently, the appeal was rejected on the foundation that merely the hard copy had been furnished and the needed soft copy had not been uploaded on the portal.

It was furnished by the taxpayer that due to technical issues they were not able to upload the soft copy. However, the taxpayer furnished to upload the same and they did not succeed because of the glitches with the portal. The taxpayer furnished that if a chance is allotted then they can upload the needed documents.

But it was furnished that the appeal was not accepted as of the non-filing of the soft copy. They indeed remarked that there was a 1½ month delay in appeal filing, which surpasses the legal limit and the appellate authority does not have the authority to condone these delays under the law.

Madras High Court Observations

It was remarked by the bench that the plea was not accepted only on the foundation that the soft copy was not uploaded due to technical glitches.

“This Court acknowledges that the delay in filing the appeal was genuine, as it was caused by these issues during the upload process. In such circumstances, an appeal should not be rejected without allowing the parties to be heard, particularly when the rejection arises from technical issues beyond their control.” Bench mentioned.

Considering the above-said, the petition was allowed by the bench and the taxpayer to furnish the plea both manually and via uploading of the soft copy in 30 days.

Case TitleM/s.Shivpad Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Deputy Commissioner (ST)
CitationW.P.No.26655 of 2024
W.M.P.No.29173 of 2024
Date30.09.2022
For PetitionerMr.K.M.Malarmannan
For RespondentsMr.G.Nanmaran Special Government Pleader (Taxes)
Madras High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates