• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Officer Barred from Relevying Covered Demand: Orissa HC Quashes GST Order as Double Taxation

Orissa HC's Order In The Case of M/s. Sai Sitaram Construction V/S Joint Commissioner of CT & GST

The Orissa High Court has cancelled a GST demand issued by a state tax official, stating that it was unfair because it effectively taxed the same goods twice.

The order passed u/s 73 of the Central and Odisha GST Acts for the financial year 2021-22 has been contested by the applicant, Sai Sitaram Construction, a registered dealer.

The Joint Commissioner of State Tax, previously for the period April to September 2021, raised a demand of Rs 21,38,338 for an alleged mismatch in ITC claims vis-à-vis GSTR-2B, vide order dated 1st December 2022. From the applicant’s cash ledger, the same demand has been recovered in the pendency of the appeal.

In the following order dated 11th April 2025, covering April 2021 to March 2022, the same amount for April – September 2021 was included again, which results in duplication of the earlier demand.

Adv. Kajal Sahoo, the applicant’s counsel, claims that the same inclusion was without jurisdiction and in breach of the GST Act.

The GST department’s standing counsel, on hearing the case, acknowledged that the demand for April- September 2021 had also been included again in the April 2021 – March 2022 order.

The bench of Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice M.S. Raman held that the second demand was untenable in law as it led to double taxation. It expressed that “On the conceded position as aforesaid, this Court cannot, therefore, sustain the order dated 11th April, 2025 as tenable in the eye of law, as such a recourse would tantamount to double taxation. Hence, said order is, hereby, set aside.”

The court, while quashing the order, asked the GST officer to issue a fresh intimation restricted to the period October 2021 to March 2022.

The applicant was required to produce books of accounts, tax invoices, and other pertinent documents, after which the authority would pass a fresh order under section 73 within 6 weeks, following due opportunity of hearing.

Case TitleM/s. Sai Sitaram Construction V/S. Joint Commissioner of CT & GST
Case No.W.P.(C) No.19501 of 2025
For petitionerMs. Kajal Sahoo, Advocate
For RespondentMr. Sunil Mishra, Standing Counsel (CT & GST)
Orissa High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2025

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Tax Offer 2025

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates