• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Late ITR Filing Delays TDS Refund: Madras HC Instructs to Submit Application U/S 119(2)

Madras HC's Order for Ravikumar

An application under Section 119(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed by the Madras High Court to be submitted related to the refund of TDS related to compensation from a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). The delay in filing Income Tax Returns (ITRs) had impeded this process.

The applicant for the case asks for direction from the respondents to acknowledge the belated return filing for the AY 2019-20 to enable the consideration of the claim of the refund. The applicant was engaged in a road accident dated 07.10.2012 directing to the legal procedure for the compensation. Post distinct legal proceedings along with the petition, the compensation amount was increased to Rs 73,25,806.

On the payment of the same compensation, the Insurance Company deducted Tax Deducted at Source(TDS) amounting to Rs. 5,69,000. To avail of the refund of this TDS, the applicant has furnished the income return for the AY 2019-20 beyond the stipulated time limit, including with a representation on 23.02.2023 for condonation of delay, which remained unresolved.

Dr. B. Ramaswamy, senior standing counsel representing the respondent, accepts notice and ensures that the representation will be duly acknowledged and disposed of.

On investigation of the affidavit and related documents, the court observed that the same is regarded appropriate to regard an application u/s 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act for condonation. It will remain doubtful if the applicant’s representation is available in the income tax department record.

The writ petition is disposed of by the bench of Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy citing the applicant to submit the application u/s 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act before the jurisdictional authority or first respondent/ PCIT within a maximum period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

PCIT is asked to regard and dispose of it within 1 month from the receipt date of the representation, considering the observations cited in this order. In the same case, no costs are to be levied.

Case TitleRavikumar Vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
Case Number:W.P.No.7972 of 2024
Date27.03.2024
Counsel For AppellantMr.K.Myilsamy
Counsel For RespondentDr.B.Ramaswamy, Sr. SC
Madras High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Tax Experts

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Best Offer for Tax Professionals

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software