• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Kerala HC Orders ITAT to Review an Appeal, Even Though It was Filed After the Deadline

Kerala HC's Order for Sindhu Shaji

The Kerala High Court in a judgment, directed the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) to regard the petition after condoning the delay in filing the appeal. The Court regarded that the Appellate Authority should pass orders on the stay petitions on merits only if it condones the delay in filing the appeals.

Sri K S Hariharan Nair, Smt G Remadevi, Smt Harima Hariharan, Sri Rajath R Nath, and Sri Dheeraj Sasidharan, represented the petitioner. Sri Cyriac Tom represented the respondents.

The petitioner Sindhu Shaji, suffered an Assessment Order under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the orders levying the penalty on the applicant. The applicant has chosen a series of appeals against the order levying penalty including a series of delay petitions and a series of stay petitions.

The applicant asked for the mere relief for the direction that the amounts asked the subject to the orders will not be enforced, pending acknowledgement of the late petitions and the stay petitions via the first appellate authority.

Read Also: Kerala HC Directs Govt to Open GSTN Portal for Filing GST Return, Order from GSTAT

Petitioner counsel and the Standing Counsel appearing for the Income Tax Department and, regarding the limited nature of the relief asked via the applicant, the writ petition will remain disposed of executing the 3rd respondent to regard and pass orders on a series of delay petitions and series of stay petitions filed in series of appeals in 6 weeks from the receipt date of a certified copy of the Judgment.

Justice Gopinath P ruled that the Appellate Authority is required to pass orders on the stay petitions on merits only if it is determined to condone the delay in filing the petitions.

It moreover ruled that till the time as orders are issued on the series of delay petitions and series of stay petitions as rendered above, any proceedings for recovery of amounts due in terms of shall remain stopped.

Case TitleSindhu Shaji
CitationWP(C) NO. 7487 OF 2024
Date30.09.2022
BY ADVSSRI. K. S. Hariharan Nair
SMT. G. Remdevi
SMT. HARIMA Hariharan
SRI. Rajath R Nath
SRI. Dheeraj Sasidharan
Counsel For RespondentSRI. Cyriac Tom SC Income Tax
Kerala High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software