• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Karnataka HC Cancels GST Orders Citing Petitioner’s Inability to Answer Due to Father’s Illness and Demise

Karnataka HC's Order In Case of M/s. Nakoda Auto Distributors vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax

The Karnataka High Court quelled the summary and ex-parte order, noting that the applicant was unable to respond to the GST show-cause notices due to his father’s prolonged illness and eventual passing on 13.02.2024.

The applicant/taxpayer, Nakoda Auto Distributors, approached the court under Article 226, contesting the ex-parte order dated 31.10.2023 and the summary order issued dated 16.11.2023.

As per the applicant, the father of the partners was diagnosed with cancer in April 2023 and was hospitalized. On 13.02.2024, he passed away, and a copy of the death certificate was furnished.

The SCN was issued dated 29.09.2023 and 30.09.2023, though the applicant cannot answer or attend the proceedings due to the poor medical condition of his father. He asked for a chance to submit an objection and take part in the proceedings under section 73 of the KGST Act.

The Additional Government Advocate(AGA) in answer furnished that the notices were issued as per Section 73 of the KGST Act, and the authority was right in proceeding with the case. He requested the Court to pass a suitable order.

A single-member bench, including S.G. Pandit (Judge), noted that the applicant was not able to answer the SCN dated 29.09.2023 and 30.09.2023 as he was attending to his father, who was experiencing cancer treatment and succumbed to cancer dated 13.02.2024. Medical records and the death certificate were provided in support.

Read Also: Issuance of SCN Under GST – Section 73(10) with Time Limits

The court, acknowledging these situations, quashed the ex-parte orders on 31.10.2023 and 16.11.2023 and granted the applicant 30 days to submit the objections. It asked the applicant to appear before the respondent authority dated 06.03.2025.

The court mentioned that the applicant cannot raise the problem of limitation and that any recovered amount via attachment shall be within the final decision of the authority.

TitleM/s. Nakoda Auto Distributors vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax
CitationWrit Petition No. 917 OF 2025 (T-RES)
Date05.02.2025
For PetitionerSri. Aryaman Ghulati
For RespondentSri. K. Hemakumar
Karnataka High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Big Offer on All Software

Powering India’s Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Tax Offer 2025

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates