• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


ITAT Removes Addition as Sale Agreement Before 1.4.2014 is Not Covered by U/S 43CA

Kolkata ITAT's Order for Regal Construction

The addition holding that Section 43CA of the Income Tax Act 1961 would not be applicable to the sale agreement entered prior to 1.4.2014 would have been removed by the Kolkata Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).

The taxpayer, Regal Construction has the business of promoting/developing/constructing and sale of residential/commercial buildings. The Assessing Officer (AO) at the time of assessment proceedings, witnessed that beneath the audited accounts, the assessee would have shown the sale of 12 flats, one office room, and four shops (total of 17).

According to the details received via the sub-Registrar office, the taxpayer would have sold a total of 18 properties vide separate 18 registered sale deeds. The Assessing Officer witnessed that the taxpayer do not disclose the sale value of one property registered dated 21.07.2014.

As per that the assessing officer would have applied on the provision of Section 43CA of the Income Tax Act and computed the sale consideration difference along with that it adds that into the taxpayer’s income under 43CA of the Income Tax Act.

On behalf of the petitioner Sunil Surana has appeared argued, the provisions to section 43CA of the Income Tax Act had been inserted wef the date 1.4.2014, while the taxpayers would have agreed to sell the flats with the buyers in the year 2012-13 itself as a result, the assessee was not capable of anticipating the provisions of Section 43CA of the Income Tax Act and the requirement to accept the part of the selling consideration through cheque/banking mode/electronic mode cannot have been secured on the taxpayer in a retrospective way applying the provisions of section 43CA of the Income Tax Act.

On behalf of the respondent P. P. Barman appeared laid on the findings of the lower authorities.

The two-member Bench of Sanjay Garg (Judicial Member) and Manish Borad (Accountant Member) laid on the decision of the Bombay High Court in PCIT vs. Swananda Properties (P) Ltd.

The Bench ruled that because the provisions of Section 43CA of the Income Tax Act were introduced with effect from April 1, 2014, and because the agreement to sell was entered into prior to that date, the requirement that the consideration be paid in full or in part on or before the agreement date could not be applied retroactively because the assessee could not have anticipated the passage of Section 43CA of the Income Tax Act of 1961.

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software