• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


ITAT Lucknow Upholds Section 80IB(10) Deduction, Rejects Revenue’s Appeal Over Form 10CCB Filing

Lucknow ITAT's Order in The Case of DCIT vs. Arif Industries Pvt. Ltd.

The taxpayer has submitted an ITR for AY 2022-23, reporting a total income of Rs 1,87,10,752. During the processing of the return under Section 143(1) of the Act, the CPC rejected the taxpayer’s claim for a deduction of Rs 3,36,91,079 under Section 80IB(10), stating that the audit report in Form 10CCB had not been submitted within the prescribed time. Afterward, a tax demand of Rs 58,95,760 was raised against the taxpayer.

The taxpayer argued that both their income tax return and the audit report in Form 10CCB had been submitted on 13/10/2022, that is, before the prescribed due date for filing the return. Furthermore, the taxpayer had also submitted their tax audit report in Form 3CA-3CD, as required under Section 44AB, on 30/09/2022. The taxpayer contested this adjustment before the ‘First Appellate Authority,’ which accepted their appeal.

The Tribunal examined the arguments from both sides and found that a similar issue had already been considered by another of its benches. This matter pertains to the same assessee and relates to the same assessment year (ITA No. 638/Lkw/2024, order dated 28/10/2025). The same bench held that since Form 10CCB was submitted before the due date for filing the income tax return, that is, on 13/10/2022, the taxpayer’s claim for a deduction was in accordance with the law and should be accepted.

Regarding the issue of the timing for filing Form 10CCB, the Tribunal analysed the provisions of Section 80IB. It stated that the condition that requires the audit report to be provided within the specified time u/s 44AB is incorporated in Sections 80IB(7A), 80IB(7B), 80IB(11B) and 80IB(11C). However, no such provisions have been stipulated u/s 80IB(10).

Therefore, the Tribunal stated that the deduction claimed u/s 80IB(10) could not be denied solely on the grounds that Form 10CCB was not filed one month prior to the due date stipulated u/s 139(1). The Tribunal rejected all the arguments raised by the Revenue Department and upheld the deduction under Section 80IB(10) in favour of Arif Industries Private Limited.

Case TitleDCIT vs. Arif Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Case No.ITA No.112/Lkw/2026
Assessee bySh. Rajiv Joshi, CA
Revenue byShri Sonal Singh, Addl. CIT- DR
ITAT LucknowRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.
View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Tax Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Offer in 2026

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software