Unlimited Tax Return Filing


ITAT Instructs Commissioner to Adjudicate the Manual Appeal, Assessee Doesn’t Know e-Filing Process

Pune ITAT's Order for Deepak Shriniwas Mantri

The Pune bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) chaired by R.S. Syal (VP) rendered that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) adjudicate the petition furnished manually since they rejected the filed petition via the taxpayer on the cause that the same does not file electronically.

Though the need for e-filing of the appeals exists, the bench sees, due to some procedural factors that the taxpayer that comes from a rural background does not aware of the process of e-filing.

Beneath the same situations, the tribunal agreed that the ends of the justice does not meet satisfactorily when the impugned order would set aside and the case would be remitted to furnish the CIT(A).

The petition via the taxpayer, Deepak Shriniwas Mantri comes out of the order issued by the CIT(A) in National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi concerning the assessment year 2008-09.

Both sides would have been heard by the bench and see that the assessment order for the case was issued ex-parte under section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 fetching total income at Rs 20,35,910 as against Rs 1,41,200 shown via the taxpayer.

The authority of the Assessing Officer (AO) to count the income of the assessee through their judgment is specified in Section 144 of the Income Tax Act. aggrieved with the assessee’s compliance with tax statutes or the integrity of the information furnished via the assessee, this clause is invoked.

As per the provision, AO sends the notification to the assessee asking for the details or supporting documentation for their income tax return (ITR). When the assessee overlooks the notice then the assessing officer might move to find out the income of the assessee through the use of their effective judgment and the details at his disposal.

CIT(A) dismissed the petition preferred via the taxpayer on the basis that the petition was furnished physically and does not e-filed. But the same was acknowledged through him that the petition physically furnished was within the time.

After giving the assessee a fair chance to be heard, the single ITAT bench ordered to reevaluate the merits of the appeal.

Case TitleDeepak Shriniwas Mantri Vs ITO
CitationITA No.114/PUN/2023
Date28.02.2023
Counsel for AppellantShri M.K. Kulkarni,Ms. J.R. Chandekar
Counsel for RespondentShri Akhilesh Srivastava
Delhi ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Tax Experts

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Best Offer for Tax Professionals

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software