• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Delhi HC Revokes GST Reg. Cancellation Order Due to Misused SCN

Delhi HC's Order for M/S. Balaji Enterprises

The Delhi High Court has refused the order for the cancellation of the GST registration since the range inspector would have physically validated the premises, not by serving the notice of the physical verification and not in the report generated post to the verification was uploaded on the portal.

The division bench, Justice Rajiv Shakdher, and Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju has seen that there was an offence of the provisions of Rule 25 of CGST and the order surpassed the show cause notice.

The taxpayer by opposing the order revoking GST registration. The order was on the basis of the show-cause notice. The SCN sees that there would be nothing mentioned as to the cause of why the related authority has asked for the cancellation of registration.

The council laid the applicant to represent that the enrollment would have been taken via bogus, willful misstatement or suppression of facts.

As the principles of natural justice ask to comply with the department, the applicant was rendered to furnish an answer to SCN within 7 days.

A reply was filed by the petitioner to the Show Cause Notices stating that all returned items had been filed. Currently, all GST liabilities fall within the stimulated bracket under the GST Act 2017.

Within 1 month, the order was issued. Under the order, the applicant’s registration was revoked on the basis of the left inquiry of the applicant which would be operated by DGGI, Chennai, concerning the supply of “spurious goods.” The premises of the applicant were physically validated via the range inspector post to obtain approval from the competent head, which revealed that the premises would get sealed via DGGI, Chennai. The order shows that nothing was due from the applicant on the basis of tax, interest, penalty, or cess.

Read Also: GST REG-30 Form for Physical Verification Report by Officer

The court mentioned that the department was not able to provide a satisfactory reply and that the verification report would not get uploaded on the relevant portal. The court ordered the department to restore the applicant’s enrollment.

Case TitleBalaji Enterprises VS Principal Additional Director General
CitationW.P.(C) 10315/2022
Date07.09.2022
Counsel For AppellantAdvocate Anjali J. Manish, Priyadarshi Manish
Counsel For RespondentSr. Standing Counsel Aditya Singla
Delhi High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates