• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


ITAT: Deletes Income Tax Penalty for Cash Bonus Paid to Employees

Chandigarh ITAT 's Order for Lakhwinder Singh Panag

The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Judicial Member Diva Singh ruled in favor of the taxpayer and set aside the order refusing the levied penalty.

There were 2 kinds of payments that the taxpayer has incurred for which the current action would be invoked. Related to it the same was furnished that the same shall mention that majority of these payments would be incurred for the repair and maintenance of the machinery on the basis of the breakdowns and others while the left payments would be incurred as bonus payments to the employees.

The taxpayer, Lakhwinder Singh Panag, has been involved in the business of sand mining and running crushers, and others opposed the payments being made on holidays, Saturdays, or Sundays.

The taxpayer indeed mentioned that he was not a regular offender. The payment incurred was being provided and were real payments for the business and the taxpayer manages to confirm that the payments incurred for the breakdown or others of the machinery would be accepted via banks.

Read Also: Penalties for Late Income Tax Return Filing in India

The council shows that on the other side they laid on the impugned order, provided that the penalty might be confirmed.

Seeing that “the explanation offered cannot be outrightly discarded in the penalty proceedings, the urgent need to clear payments by an assessee functioning outside residential/commercial areas in the peculiar facts by itself, no doubt, may not have been a valid explanation as far as the quantum proceedings are concerned,” but the need of the penalty provisions under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was acknowledged and it was discovered via the single bench that the explanation should be permitted and held that the explanation was satisfactory on the same facts.

It made clear that the argument by the taxpayer that payments are genuinely for the intention of Section 40(A)(3) of the Income Tax Act has no applicability.

ITAT has cancelled the penalty proceedings setting aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)), acknowledging the facts in the current way of cash payments of bonus which has been furnished to employees.

Case TitleShri Lakhwinder Singh Panag Vs The ITO
CitationITA No. 302/CHD/2022
Date28.06.2022
Counsel For AppellantShri T.N.Singla, CA
Counsel For RespondentSmt. Priyanka Dhar, JCIT
Chandigarh ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software