• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Assessing Officer Mistakenly Issued Assessment: Punjab and Haryana High Court Validates Revision Order

Punjab & Haryana HC's Order In The Case Of Harjot Singh V/S Principal Commissioner Income Tax-Central

The Punjab & Haryana High Court upheld the revisional order passed by the Principal Commissioner Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. as the assessment was wrongly passed by the Assessing Officer ( AO ) under Section 44ADA of the Act.

The taxpayer Harjot Singh, is an individual who filed his return. Upon search operation, the taxpayer surrendered an additional income of Rs.15,11,555 on account of excess stock, construction of a residential house, and renovation of business premises.

The Income Tax Assessing Officer evaluated the income from professional usage before depreciation and interest apart from income under section 44AD and reached the determination of overall income to be Rs.39,15,840 for AY 2018-19. The PCIT practicing his revisionary jurisdiction, discovered the order of the AO was incorrect and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue.

Read Also:- Haryana and Punjab HC: SCN U/S 148 By Assessing Officer Defeats The Object of Faceless Assessment

It was revealed by the bench that AO has furnished the benefit to the taxpayer taking account of the income as per Section 44AD. It was remarked by the bench that the assessment needs to be done under the head income from other sources u/s 115 BBE.

The Division Bench of Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice Sanjay Vashisth kept that the taxpayer had neither had his accounts audited by the accountant nor provided a report of such audit under the provisions of section 44AB of the income tax law. The case of the taxpayer, prima facie was covered u/s 44ADA but the return of Income filed was not under the provisions of section 44ADA.

Case TitleHarjot Singh V/S Principal Commissioner Income Tax-Central
CitationITA-58-2024(O&M)
Date25.07.2024
Counsel For AppellantMs. Aakriti, Advocate
Counsel For RespondentMr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth
Punjab & Haryana High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Best Offer for Tax Professionals

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software