• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Ahmedabad ITAT Sets Aside Assessment, Directs Re-Trial After Denial of Proper Notice

Ahmedabad ITAT's Order in The Case of Meenaz Anjum Dayatar vs. The ITO

An assessment order against a homemaker has been set aside by the Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which directed the assessing officer to conduct a fresh trial after providing a fair opportunity of being heard.

As per the tribunal, the taxpayer did not receive natural justice as she had not obtained proper notices, and the case was determined ex parte.

For the fiscal year 2017-18 (Assessment Year 2018-19), Meenaz Anjum Dayatar, a homemaker from Mumbai, had not filed an income tax return. After discovering through its Insight Portal that she had sold an immovable property for Rs. 1.15 crore and had made cash deposits of Rs. 8,89,500 in her bank account, the income tax department had reopened her case.

The Assessing Officer initiated a case reopening under section 147 due to the absence of a filed return. Notices were subsequently issued under section 142(1). In the absence of any response from the taxpayer, the officer classified the total amount of Rs. 1,23,89,500 as unexplained income u/s 68. Consequently, the assessment was finalised u/s 144.

Before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), dissatisfied, Dayatar appealed. However, the appellate authority dismissed her case ex parte, noting that she had not filed any submissions or attended hearings even after imposing repeated notices. Assessing Officer’s additions were confirmed.

In a recent tribunal case, the counsel for the assessee presented the argument that she was a homemaker without a regular source of taxable income and had limited experience with checking emails.

It was highlighted that following the death of her spouse, the property had been sold by her brother, which led to her not actively monitoring electronic communications. Additionally, she emphasised that while she had updated her postal address, she had not received any physical notices from the department.

The counsel claimed that the assessment was made without permitting the acquisition cost and indexation cost against the sale consideration, and the sale value was incorrectly considered as income under section 68. Also, the addition of cash deposits was not explained.

The orders of the lower authorities have been supported by the departmental representative.

The tribunal post-hearing, both sides said that the assessment was framed ex parte, and the appeal was dismissed ex parte. It ruled that the taxpayer had not been furnished with a fair chance to present her case.

The Bench, including Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member) and Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar (Accountant Member), said that her appeal of not being aware of the proceedings because of her personal situation cannot be overlooked.

Read Also: ITAT Ahmedabad Partly Quashes PCIT’s Order for Unverified Accommodation Entry Additions U/S 263

It then restored the case to the file of the assessing officer by deciding the case afresh, post providing a fair chance of hearing, and to pass a speaking order as per the regulation. The taxpayer was asked to cooperate in the proceedings.

In conclusion, the appeal was permitted concerning statistical objectives.

Case TitleMeenaz Anjum Dayatar vs. The ITO
Case No.ITA No: 1174/Ahd/2025
AssesseeShri Huzefa M. Mala
RespondentShri Amit Pratap Singh
Ahmedabad ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2025

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Tax Offer 2025

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software