Powerd By SAG INFOTECH
Notifications can be turned of anytime from browser settings
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) clarified that failing to deposit long-term capital gains (LTCG) into a capital gain account scheme does not warrant disallowance of deduction under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act. Saktijit Dey (Vice President) and M. Balaganesh (Accountant Member) took a meticulous approach in addressing the matter. […]
Recently, the Bombay High Court has ruled that the amendment made in accordance with section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, doesn’t have a retrospective impact on limiting investments in India. This amended provision takes effect from April 1, 2015, and will be applicable in the future, but not before the amendment date. The […]
Discussion about section 54B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 w.e.f. AY 1970-71 Capital gain on the land transfer utilized for agricultural purposes does not get levied in some cases. Latest Update 17th March 2023 09th January 2023 54B. (1) (w.e.f. AY 1974-75) as per the provisions of sub-section (2), (w.e.f. AY 1988-89) in which […]
According to section 54F of the Income Tax Return (ITR) The income tax department has declared that ITR 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 for AY 2019-20 is now available for e-Filing and soon other ITRs will also be available, the assessee is free to do the investment in the house property in […]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore, has ruled that according to the 2015 amendment made in section 54F of the Income Tax Act 1961, the benefit of capital gain deductions will be available to the one residential property only. Latest Update 14th November 2022 The ITAT of Pune bench has ruled that the construction […]
In DCIT vs. Sandeep Hooda, adjudicated by ITAT Delhi, the taxpayer’s eligibility for deduction u/s 54 of the I-T Act, 1961, is scrutinized. The dispute emerges from the absence of essential amenities in the claimed residential property. The case background is that the taxpayer, Sandeep Hooda, qualifies for tax deduction u/s 54 despite the shortage […]
The Allahabad High Court ruled that the purpose of evading tax is an essential condition for levying penalty u/s 54(1)(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008. Section 54(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 furnishes for circumstances under which penalties can be charged to taxpayers. It is furnished that […]
The New Delhi ITAT after determining that the taxpayer does not file either of the conditions specified in section 54 of the income tax, ruled that no infirmity in the IT authority’s order in refusing the advantage of the deduction of the long-term capital gains to the taxpayer under section 54. The Division Bench of […]
The Delhi High Court was directed to apply for a refund mandated under section 54 of the Central Goods and Service Tax ( CGST ) Act, 2017 for a refund of GST paid. The court removes the period between 19.01.2024 and the date of judgment for limitation. The applicant, Pedersen Consultants India Pvt Ltd, asks […]
