• twitter-icon

Search results for: penalty

Allahabad HC's Order In Case of M/S Mid Town Associates vs Additional Commissioner Grade-2

Allahabad HC Quashes GST SCN as Well as Penalty Order Regarding Pre-Interception of E-Way Bills and Tax Evasion

The Allahabad High Court ruled that it is obvious that the only breach is a technical one wherein the E-Way Bill was not present in the vehicle while quashing the Goods and Services Tax (GST) SCN and Penalty Order for alleged tax evasion. For transporting goods without an E-Way Bill the petitioner’s vehicle was intercepted […]

Allahabad HC's Order In The Case of RS Industrial Solutions Vs Additional Commissioner Grade 2 and Another

Allahabad HC: No Penalty for Mistakenly Forgetting GST E-Way Bill Part-B, If Proof Provided

The Allahabad High Court in a judgment addressed the problem of levying the penalties for non-filing of Part-B of the GST E-Way Bill without proof of intention to evade tax. The case, Rs Industrial Solutions vs Additional Commissioner Grade 2, sheds light on the interpretation of tax laws and penalties under the Act. The matter […]

Delhi ITAT's Order In the Case of Sanjeev Kumar Goyal VS ITO

Reasonable Cause is Proven for Failure to Timely File an Audit Report, Delhi ITAT Vacates the Penalty

Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act emits an obligation on the taxpayer to get accounts audited prior to the cited date and provide by that date the report of such audit, New Delhi ITAT ruled. The ITAT while learning that there was reasonable cause for failure in providing the Tax Audit Report in time, […]

NFRA Slaps INR 1Cr Penalty to M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj Firm

NFRA Sets Penalty on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj Firm for Audit Lapses in RHFL

U/s 134(4) of the Companies Act following an investigation and proceedings, a verdict has been reached against an audit firm and its key personnel. After due process, the Audit Firm M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj, along with CA Piyush Patni (EP) and CA Pawan Kumar Gupta (EQCR), have been found guilty of professional misconduct. The verdict […]

Calcutta HC's Order In the Case of Ashish Kumar Sharma vs. the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Bureau

Calcutta HC: Tax Dept Can’t Impose Penalty Without Proof of Higher Value Than GST Invoice

The Calcutta High Court ruled that the GST department could not calculate the penalty amount on a higher value compared to the invoice value without proper proof and reason. The bench of Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya has marked that a transporter or owner of the goods is forced to carry specific […]

Allahabad HC's Order for Durga Steel Rolling Mills Thru. Partner Amit Arora

Allahabad HC Imposes Penalty on Tax Evasion U/S 54(1)(2) of the UPVAT

The Allahabad High Court ruled that the purpose of evading tax is an essential condition for levying penalty u/s 54(1)(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008. Section 54(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 furnishes for circumstances under which penalties can be charged to taxpayers. It is furnished that […]

Hero Motocorp imposed with a GST Fine of Rs 605 Cr

GST Authority Imposes a Penalty of INR 605 Cr on Hero Motocorp

On Thursday (April 4, 2024) Hero MotoCorp received a GST notice worth Rs 605 crore for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2017-18 and 2019-20. It shall be filing appeals against the orders with appellate authorities, the automaker stated. HeroMotoCorp filed for the development minutes post-closing of the stock market on Thursday, where the automaker’s stock […]

Chennai ITAT's Order for Nammalvar Lingusamy

Chennai ITAT: A Massive Amount of Sale Receipt Reflect as Violative in Section 269SS, Impose Tax Penalty U/S 271D

The Chennai ITAT said that receipt of sale consideration of a massive amount of Rs. 1.60 Crores in cash, which is, in breach of the provisions of section 269SS (this section restricts cash receipts over & above twenty thousand) of the Income-tax Act, rightly merits the imposition of penalty under section 271D. The Bench of […]

Mumbai ITAT Order for Meyer Organics Pvt Ltd

Mumbai ITAT Directs Authority to Delete Penalty U/S 271(1)(c) for Bona Fide Mistakes 

In the matter of Meyer Organics Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT, the Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) furnished an important decision for levying the penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The ruling of the tribunal is on the correction of bona fide glitches in the original return in the assessment proceedings. Detailed […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Tax Experts

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates