• twitter-icon

Search results for: pcit

Surat ITAT's Order for Preetiben Chhatrasingh Chauhan

ITAT: Not Possible To Issue A Revision Order For Matters By PCIT That Fall Outside The Purview of Limited Scrutiny

The Surat bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that the revision order, raised by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) on matters beyond the limited scrutiny, couldn’t be justified. Consequently, the tribunal invalidated the revision order. Preetiben Chhatrasingh Chauhan, the taxpayer, generated income from various sources, including house property, business, agriculture, […]

Delhi ITAT’s Order for Navneet Bhardwaj

ITAT: PCIT Can’t Have Authority to Use Section 263 Under Income Tax for Revision

It was determined that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) did not have the authority to gather the revisionary requirements of Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as determined by the Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). Therefore, the order for reassessment for the Assessment Year 2016-17 was overturned. […]

Ahmedabad ITAT's Order for Chaitanya Bansibhai Nagori

ITAT: AO Converts Limited to Full Scrutiny After PCIT Approval

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad bench, Shri Mahavir Prasad, JM & Shri Waseem Ahmed, AM held that the AO can convert the Limited to Comprehensive scrutiny on some needs exclusively with the approval of PCIT in writing. The petitioner is a doctor who runs a hospital in Ahmedabad. The taxpayer has brought an […]

Surat ITAT's Order in the Case of ACIT Vs Shanker Nebhumal Uttamchandani

ITAT Surat: WhatsApp Pics Alone Don’t Prove Income Without Verification

The matter of ACIT Vs Shanker Nebhumal Uttamchandani, as decided by ITAT Surat, emphasizes the importance of substantial proof in tax assessments, especially concerning additions incurred based on digital device data. The Assessing Officer (AO) had incurred the additions to the taxpayer’s income based on particulars discovered in the digital device at the time of […]

Bombay HC's Order In Case of Pankaj Kailash Agarwal VS ACIT

Bombay HC: To Ensure Justice, CBDT is Empowered to Condone Delayed Tax Returns

Under section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, the Bombay High Court specifying the scope of authority stated that the legislature has granted power to the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (respondent no.3) to condone the delay to enable the authorities to do substantive justice to the parties by disposing the case on merits. Therefore, […]

MP Singh Appointed Chief Commissioner of Income Tax

MP Singh Takes Charge as a Chief Commissioner of J&K, Ladakh

W.e.f 1st April MP Singh, 1990 batch of Indian Revenue Service (IRS) has been promoted as Chief Commissioner of Income Tax J&K and Ladakh headquarter at Srinagar by the Department of Personnel and Training and Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi. Singh was posted as Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, J&K, and Ladakh for […]

Kerala HC’s Order for Pallathukadavil Ibrahimkutty Abdul Kabeer

Kerala HC: Order to Hold off Implementing the Final Appeal Until Further Notice Under IT Act

Under the Income Tax Act, 1961 the Kerala High Court asked to stay proceedings till the passing of the final order of appeal. Under the Income Tax Act, the applicant already filed an appeal against the revision order. The petitioner’s assessment, Pallathukadavil Ibrahimkutty Abdul Kabeer was completed for the year 2018-19 by order on 15.03.2021. […]

Madras HC's Order for Ravikumar

Late ITR Filing Delays TDS Refund: Madras HC Instructs to Submit Application U/S 119(2)

An application under Section 119(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed by the Madras High Court to be submitted related to the refund of TDS related to compensation from a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). The delay in filing Income Tax Returns (ITRs) had impeded this process. The applicant for the case asks for […]

Chandigarh ITAT's Order In Case of Manuj Jain HUF verses Pr. CIT

Chandigarh ITAT: Higher Official Can’t Use Revisionary Authority U/S 263 if AO Conducted a Proper Investigation

Finding that the taxpayer operates seasonal trade in hosiery items duly backed by documentary proof, which AO investigated accepting the said transactions and resultant profit has been carried to tax, the Chandigarh ITAT said that the PCIT cannot be allowed to invoke his jurisdiction under section 263 only because he assumes that there is the […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Tax Experts

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software