Powerd By SAG INFOTECH
Notifications can be turned of anytime from browser settings
For notice pay, scrap sales, and miscellaneous income the Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) granted deductions under Section 80 IC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Under section 80-IC of the Act, the taxpayer has claimed a deduction by ministering them as profit originating from the business of eligible […]
Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act emits an obligation on the taxpayer to get accounts audited prior to the cited date and provide by that date the report of such audit, New Delhi ITAT ruled. The ITAT while learning that there was reasonable cause for failure in providing the Tax Audit Report in time, […]
The Mumbai ITAT on observing that the AO had audited and still not denied the books of account, ruled that the ad hoc disallowance that the AO had made was not justified and ought to be deleted. The Bench of the ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) Kuldip Singh (Judicial Member) and S. Rifaur Rahman (Accountant […]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai in the recent case analyzed the petition furnished by the taxpayer against an order via the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi. From the addition of Rs 11,33,000 as undisclosed income by the Assessing Officer the dispute emerged. U/s 148 of the Income Tax […]
In the matter of Shamanna Reddy vs. ITO, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore addressed a petition against the order of CIT(A) for the AY 2018-19. The petitioner, an individual, challenged the dismissal of their petition via the CIT(A) on technical foundations, and the following assessment order passed u/s 147 read with section 144 […]
Visakhapatnam ITAT on finding that there is no shortfall of TDS and the taxpayer is eligible to obtain credit of the entire amount, rendered the AO to allot the credit of the whole amount deducted as tax at source under section 194Q of the Income Tax Act. The Bench of Duvvuru Rl Reddy (Judicial Member) […]
In DCIT vs. Sandeep Hooda, adjudicated by ITAT Delhi, the taxpayer’s eligibility for deduction u/s 54 of the I-T Act, 1961, is scrutinized. The dispute emerges from the absence of essential amenities in the claimed residential property. The case background is that the taxpayer, Sandeep Hooda, qualifies for tax deduction u/s 54 despite the shortage […]
No rejection should be there for the taxpayer’s claim since the same was not notified in the tax audit report, certainly in the cases where the other proof is available on record recommending the deduction as per the provisions of section 43B on a payment basis is available, Rajkot ITAT ruled. The Bench of the […]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that the addition could not be deleted for the only cause that the section under which the addition is made is cited incorrectly and that it is essential to look into the merits of the case. The bench of Anikesh Banerjee (Judicial Member) and Padmavathy […]
