• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Vishakhapatnam ITAT: Assessee Can Claim ITC for TCS Paid Even When No TDS Shortfall Exists U/S 194Q

ITAT's Order In Case of Kanjula Rajagopal Reddy Firm VS Income Tax Officer

Visakhapatnam ITAT on finding that there is no shortfall of TDS and the taxpayer is eligible to obtain credit of the entire amount, rendered the AO to allot the credit of the whole amount deducted as tax at source under section 194Q of the Income Tax Act.

The Bench of Duvvuru Rl Reddy (Judicial Member) witnessed while referring the CBDT Circular No. 452 that “Kaccha Arahtias are concerned, the turnover does not include the sales effected on behalf of the principals and only the gross commission has to be considered for the purpose of 44AB.”(Para 5)

According to the facts of the case, the taxpayer has furnished its income return which was processed and accepted. But, the AO while processing the return furnished via the taxpayer noted that the taxpayer had claimed TDS of Rs. 72,218. The AO acknowledging the facts and circumstances of the matter applied Rule 37BA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, and limited the claim of the taxpayer to an extent of Rs. 9,583 only and passed Intimation.

Post acknowledging the taxpayer submission the CIT(A) partly permitted the petition of the taxpayer. 

Kaccha Arahtias turnover contains only the gross commission and not the sales effected on behalf of their principals, Bench observed.

The taxpayer is just a licensed commission agent in Agricultural Market Committee Yard, which is formed under the rules and regulations of the Government of Andhra Pradesh, bench witnessed.

The Bench observed that the Circular issued via the CBDT squarely applies to the taxpayer and therefore the taxpayer is serving only as an agent (kaccha arahtia).

On discovering that the taxpayer is eligible to get a credit of the whole amount deducted as tax, ITAT permitted the appeal of the taxpayer.

Case TitleKanjula Rajagopal Reddy Firm VS Income Tax Officer
CitationI.T.A. No.59/Viz/2024
Date27.03.2024
Appellant bySri GVN Hari, AR
Respondent byDr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR
Vishakhapatnam ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software