• twitter-icon

Search results for: 143(2)

Visakhapatnam ITAT's Order in The Case of KVRECPL – Irpinfratech (JV) vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

ITAT: Assessment Without Sec. 143(2) Notice Is Invalid and Can’t Be Rectified by Section 292BB

The Visakhapatnam Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) reviewed the validity of an assessment conducted under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The focus of the examination was whether this assessment could be upheld or rectified at a later stage despite the absence of a required notice under Section 143(2) of […]

Delhi ITAT Order in the Case of Anita Garg vs. Income Tax Officer

ITAT Delhi Quashes Assessment Framed U/S 143(3) Due to Invalid Notice Format U/S 143(2)

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Delhi ruled that the assessment conducted by the Assessing Officer under Section 143(3) on December 27, 2019, following a notice issued under Section 143(2) on September 22, 2018, is invalid. The tribunal found that the notice was not in the format required by the Central Board of Direct […]

Ahmedabad ITAT's Order In the Case of Jivarajbhai Ramabhai Chaudhary vs ITO

Ahmedabad ITAT Cancels Assessment Due to Failure to Issue Tax Notice U/S 143(2) and Unjustified Additions

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) quashed the assessment for failure to issue the needed notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act,1961, and unjustified additions. The taxpayer Jivarajbhai Ramabhai Chaudhary submitted the plea 63 days late due to a mistake by the Chartered Accountant. The delay was elaborated on and not countered […]

Hyderabad ITAT's Order for Gonuguntla Nirmala Devi

Hyderabad ITAT: Re-assessment Without Notice Under I-T Section 143(2) is Invalid

The re-assessment without the issuance of notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act 1961 was void, Hyderabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled. Gonuguntla Nirmala Devi, an individual taxpayer, submitted her tax return for the 2012-13 assessment year on March 30, 2014, disclosing her income. The tax authorities initially processed her […]

Bangalore ITAT's Order for Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences

ITAT Bangalore Cancels Notice U/S 143(2) Due to No Notice to Taxpayer

The Assessment Order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) has been cancelled by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore Bench reason that an obligatory notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was not served to the taxpayer before the finish of the assessment proceedings. The taxpayer, Rajiv Gandhi University […]

Delhi ITAT's Order in The Case of Krishna Gopal Saraf vs The A.C.I.T

ITAT: Presumption U/S 292C Regarding Documents Found During Search is Rebuttable, Not Conclusive

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”) ruled that the presumption u/s 292C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the ownership and truth of documents discovered in search, is rebuttable and is not conclusive in specifying undisclosed income. The taxpayer, Krishna Gopal Saraf, a salaried employee of Sarthak Vanijya India Ltd (SVIL), […]

Kerala HC's Order In Case of Sterling Farm Research and Services Pvt. Ltd vs. CIT

Kerala HC: Section 263 Can Be Applied If AO Fails to Address Core Issues in Tax Order

The Kerala High Court ruled that Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, can be invoked where the Assessing Officer (AO) is not able to address the main issue in the assessment order. The bench stated that the problem does not appear to have been addressed by the assessing authority when issuing an order […]

Kerala HC's Order In the Case of Sravan Kumar Neela Vs. ACIT

Kerala HC: Additional Evidence Can’t Be Used to Revise Voluntary Tax Returns

The Kerala High Court has made a ruling regarding tax returns. It stated that if someone has voluntarily submitted their tax returns, they cannot go back and change them by adding new evidence later on. This decision is based on a specific rule 29 of the ITAT rules that allows the tax appeal tribunal to […]

Delhi ITAT's Order In the Case of Ram Lakhan vs. DCIT

ITAT Delhi: Tax Penalty U/S 270A Can’t Be Imposed on Estimated Income

The penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, cannot be levied when the underlying addition is based on the estimation of income, the Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled. The income of the taxpayer Ram Lakhan for A.Y. 2017-18 has been estimated by the Assessing Officer […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software