• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


HP HC: Claim for Interest on Delayed GST Refund Must Be Raised Before Statutory Authority

HP HC Order Case Of Ms Paramount Agrotech Food Vs State Of Himachal Pradesh

The Himachal Pradesh High Court said that the issues of interest in a GST refund will be raised before the statutory authority instead of the writ court. The court ordered the taxpayer to approach the legal authority.

The division bench of Justice Ajay Mohan Goel and Justice Yogesh Jaswal stated that the taxpayer must only invoke the finality clause when they are not satisfied with the relief furnished by the regulatory authority.

A writ petition had been submitted by M/s Paramount Agrotech Food (P) Ltd seeking the release of GST refund of Rs 7,77,375 u/s 54 of the GST Act, 2017 with interest u/s 56 based on an order of the appellate authority dated 21st November 2025.

As per the applicant’s counsel, the interest has been pending since 2023. However, the State asserted that the appellate authority passed the order on 21st November 2025 and the department has taken measures. Thus, no interest is left on the part of the applicant.

Section 56 of GST deals with the interest on late GST refunds. When a formal application is submitted for the refund, the department should issue the refund within 60 days. If the refund is issued after 60 days, then the deopartment/ government should pay 6% interest per annum.

Read Also: GST Official Refund Procedure: All You Need to Know

If an application is filed following a favourable order from an adjudicating authority, appellate authority, appellate tribunal, or court, and the refund is not issued within 60 days, the department is required to make payment at an annual rate of 9%.

The Court had not adjudicated the merits of the case. Instead, it stated that the legal authority should be approached regarding interest on delayed refunds.

The bench said that:

‘If, after exhausting statutory remedies, the party is still not satisfied or, for that matter, there is any aggrieved party(s), then such party can invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India under the “finality clause”.’

In response to the petitioner’s counsel’s submission that the application to be filed before the authority for interest on a delayed refund should be disposed of promptly, the Court directed that the necessary orders be issued within 60 days.

Case TitleM/s Paramount Agrotech Food (P) Ltd vs State of Himachal Pradesh and others
Case No.CWP No.11706 of 2026
For PetitionerMr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate
For RespondentMr. Sushant Keprate
Himachal Pradesh High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.
View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Tax Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Offer in 2026

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates