• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Allahabad HC Overturns GST Demand Due to Incorrect Portal Notice Placement

Allahabad HC's Order in The Case of M/S Ram Balak Gupta vs. State of U.P. and 2 others

The Allahabad High Court, in a ruling, quashed a GST demand after discovering that the department had uploaded the notices and orders under the ‘Additional Notices and Orders’ tab instead of the ‘Due Notices and Orders’ tab on the GST portal.

The applicant, Ram Balak Gupta, has contested an order dated 30.11.2023 issued by the Assistant Commissioner. The counsel of the applicant claimed that they were clueless about the demand because it was not visible in the proper section of the portal, leading to a failure to challenge it in time.

The applicant laid on an earlier ruling in Ola Fleet Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. State of U.P. where the court had addressed an identical issue and granted relief to the taxpayer. It was claimed by the applicant that the wrong uploading of the notices breaches the norms of natural justice.

The counsel of the GST department claimed that the tax officials do not have any control over how the notices appear on the GST portal since the system was managed via the GST Network (GSTN). It was claimed by the department that the notices were available to the applicant despite when they were placed in a distinct tab.

It was noted by the bench Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Justice Kshitij Shailendra, that the applicant was qualified to the benefit of the doubt as no evidence refusing their claim that the demand notice was inaccessible under the designated section was there.

Read Also: Allahabad HC Overturns GST Demand and Penalty for Trader with Suspended Registration, Validates Tax Invoice and E-Way Bill for Goods in Transit

It was ruled by the court that the same misplacement deprives the applicant of having a fair chance to answer within the specified limitation period.

The court observed that already such problems are been recognized before and ruled in favour of taxpayers. The demand order has been quashed by the court and asked the assessing officer to issue a fresh notice with at least 15 days clear time for the applicant to answer.

Also, the Allahabad High Court asked that all future proceedings be performed merely post ensuring the precise notice delivery. The writ petition was permitted.

Case TitleM/S Ram Balak Gupta vs. State of U.P. and 2 others
CitationWRIT TAX No. – 975 of 2025
Date12.03.2025
Counsel for PetitionerVedika Nath, Yashonidhi Shukla
Counsel for Respondent Ankur Agarwal
Allahabad High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Big Offer on All Software

Empowering Experts in India’s Taxation Industry

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Tax Offer 2025

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates