• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Madras HC: Excess Tax Payments Can Be Adjusted Against GST Pre-Deposit for Final Hearing

Madras HC's Order in the Case of Sri Murugan Typewriting Institute vs. The Deputy Commissioner (CT)

The Madras High Court in a ruling carried that the filed amount in excess of the admitted tax obligations can be adjusted against the pre-deposit need for a final hearing chance in Goods and Services Tax (GST) disputes.

The applicant, Sri Murugan Typewriting Institute, is in teaching typewriting services and registered under the GST Act, 2017, contested an assessment order dated October 27, 2023, regarding the financial year 2019-2020.

From discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns, the order came to pass directing to the issuance of notice under Forms ASMT-10 and GST DRC-01. The applicant even after reminding neither furnished a response nor filed the disputed tax culminating in the impugned order.

It was claimed that the notices and the orders were merely uploaded on the GST portal and not served via registered after or personal tendering making them inaccessible. The same absence of access makes participation deprived in adjudication proceedings.

Indeed it was argued by the applicant that beyond 10% which was filed to the appellant authority an excess amount of Rs 10 lakh filed beyond the admitted tax obligation can be adjusted against the 25% Pre-deposit needed for filing objections.

Read Also: Madras HC Orders Fresh Hearing for R.B. Traders Due to GST Consultant’s Lapse; 90% of Disputed Tax Paid

Justice Mohammed Shaffiq, marking that the quoted precedent of M/s. K. Balakrishnan, Balu Cables vs. O/o. the Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (W.P.(MD) No. 11924 of 2024), set aside the impugned order and asked the applicant to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within 4 weeks.

The respondent authority considering the applicant’s request was asked to acknowledge the excess tax payment on computing the 25% requirement.

The Madras High Court ordered the immediate lifting of bank account attachments levied as part of recovery proceedings, laid on compliance with the pre-deposit directive. Negligence to satisfy the said conditions shall directed in the restoration of the impugned order.

Case TitleSri Murugan Typewriting Institute vs. The Deputy Commissioner (CT)
CitationW.P.No.35797 of 2024
Date02.12.2024
For PetitionerMr.P.Suresh Babu
For RespondentsMr.G.Nanmaran
Madras High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates