• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


PB & HR High Court Deletes the Order U/S 148a(b) and INR 10K Penalty on the Tax Dept

Punjab & Haryana HC's Order for Nilam Mantri

A fine of Rs. 10K was imposed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana on the income tax department invalidating the order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act and the notice has also been issued following Section 148 of the Income Tax Act.

The panel of Justice G.S. Sandhawalia and Justice Lapita Banerji has stated that the notification under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act dated March 19, 2022, which was not specifically delivered, and the subsequent directive under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act issued on April 4, 2022, without providing an opportunity, would be considered against the natural justice principles.

The petitioner/assessee has contested the reassessment notice and the directive. Based on the information available to the department, it was observed that there was a sale transaction of immovable property for a sum of Rs. 1,21,00,000 during the relevant assessment year 2015-16.

The petitioner was informed of whether it constituted taxable income or not and was asked to provide reasons and present essential documents as evidence, along with the calculation of the capital gain resulting from the property sale.

Important: Legal Solution for Assessment & Reassessment Notice U/S 148 for Assessee

Since the notification dated March 19, 2022, was not specifically delivered and the subsequent order was issued on April 4, 2022, the court acknowledged that the petitioner-assessee has presented sufficient evidence to indicate that the notification and the subsequent order dated April 4, 2022, were served to the petitioner thereafter.

It is necessary to grant an opportunity to respond to the show cause notice, and therefore, the subsequent orders dated April 4, 2022, cannot be upheld solely on this basis, especially since enough needed evidence in the form of reports from the Post Office regarding the dispatch of documents has also been submitted.

The penal granted the petition imposing a fine of Rs. 10,000 to be paid to the petitioner assessee.

Case TitleNilam Mantri Versus ITO
CitationCWP-12994-2022
Date22.11.2023
Counsel For PetitionerNikhil Goyal
Counsel For RespondentSaurabh Kapoor
Punjab and Haryana High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Tax Experts

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Best Offer for Tax Professionals

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software