• twitter-icon

Search results for: income tax department

Calcutta HC's Order in Case of Gpt Sons Pvt Ltd vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central 2 Kolkata

Calcutta HC Rejects Application of IT Section 292B to Scrutiny Notice Issued in Amalgamating Company’s Name

Scrutiny Notice Was Issued In Amalgamating Company’s Name Despite Dept Knowing Of Amalgamation: Calcutta HC Declines To Apply S.292B Of Income Tax Act The Calcutta High Court despite the Assessing Officer being aware of the company’s amalgamation has denied applying Section 292B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to a scrutiny notice issued in an […]

Cuttack ITAT's Order In the Case of ARSS Developers Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Cuttack ITAT Upholds Decision of CIT(A) to Eliminate ₹3.08 Crore Penalty for AY 2014–15 U/S 271(1)(c)

The Cuttack Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) carried the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) to remove the Rs.3,08,11,278 penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for the Assessment Year 2014-15 since the underlying quantum addition no more existed. An appeal has been filed by the revenue against the CIT(A), order on 25.6.2024, which removes the […]

MP HC's Order In Case Of PR. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Vs Mukul Kakar

MP HC Deletes Addition U/s 68, Finding Insufficient Grounds for Appeal U/s 260A

Discovering that legal norms have been applied effectively via the Tribunal in valuing the proof and there has been no substantial question that emerges for consideration, the Madhya Pradesh High Court authorized the measure of the Tribunal in removing the additions made u/s 68. Under section 68 of the Income tax Act where any sum […]

Kerala HC's Order in the Case of Mary Queens Mission Hospital Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Kerala HC: Delay Condonation Applications Should Be Judicious, Not Hyper-Technical

The applications for condonation of delay should have been regarded without being too hyper-technical and in a judicious manner, ruled by the Kerala High Court. It was noted by the bench of Justice Gopinath P. that the delay in audit report filing in Form-10B can be 30 days, as the law merely needs that the […]

Calcutta HC's Order In Case of West Bengal Welfare Society Vs CIT

Calcutta HC Upholds ITAT’s Order, Ruling Assessee Eligible for Reg. Within Six Months U/S 80G(5)(iii)

In its recent decision, the Calcutta High Court upheld a ruling by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) allowing an assessee to seek registration under section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 after the initiation of the activity. The revenue department filed a petition under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, disputing […]

Cuttack ITAT's Order in Case of M/s Harichandanpur LAMPS Vs ITO

Cuttack ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) for Reassessment of Non-Compliance and Evaluation of Evidence

The Cuttack bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in a case has remanded the petition via the taxpayer against the commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) order after condoning a 69-day delay. It was remarked by the tribunal that the non-compliance and the absence of documentation in the order of the CIT (Appeals) furnished […]

Bombay HC's Order in the Case of Benaifer Vispi Patel Vs. The Income Tax Officer

Bombay HC: AO Must Verify the Accuracy of Information Before Initiating a Reassessment

The Bombay High Court has determined that Assessing Officers (AOs) must verify information before initiating reassessment proceedings based on faceless data. This ruling comes from a bench of Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Somasekhar Sundaresan, who underscored the importance of verification when AOs intend to act under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, particularly when […]

Telangana HC's Order In Case of M/s. Standard Chartered Bank vs The Principal Commissioner of Central Tax and others

Telangana HC: No Penalty for Bank’s Filing GST Returns Due to Technical Issue

The applicant bank cannot file its return in its GST portal as a technical issue and cannot be loaded, with demand, penalty, and interest, the Telangana High Court ruled. The bench of Justice Sujoy Paul and Justice Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao noted that it was the responsibility of the department to maintain its portal function. If […]

Haryana & Punjab HC's Order In The Case of Jatinder Singh Bhangu V/S Union of India & others

Haryana and Punjab HC: SCN U/S 148 By Assessing Officer Defeats The Object of Faceless Assessment

The Punjab & Haryana High Court while indicating that the scheme of faceless assessment is applicable from the phase of SCN under section 148 as well as 148A, held that notice under section 148 could not be issued via the jurisdictional assessing officer post introduction of the faceless assessment scheme. As SCN has been issued […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2025

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software