• twitter-icon

Search results for: Assessing Officer

Ahmedabad ITAT's Order In the Case of Shri Jignesh Jaysukhlal Ghiya vs. the DCIT

ITAT Allows Tax Deduction U/S 54 on Sale of Old Property, Even If Not Used for Acquiring New Asset

Tax deduction u/s 54 of Income Tax Act 1961 ( ITA ) is permissible even if proceeds from the sale of old property are not reinvested in the acquisition of new asset/property, the Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled. The taxpayer, Jignesh Jaysukhlal, owns a residential property, which he decided to sell. […]

Ahmedabad ITAT's Order In the Case of Radha Mohan Education Charitable Trust Vs ITO

Ahmedabad ITAT Cancels Order U/S 144 for Sending IT Notices to Incorrect Address

An order passed under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (ITA), noting that income tax notices were not sent to the actual address of the assessee has been set aside by the Ahmedabad “A” Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). A notice on 08.03.2018 under section 142(1) of ITA was issued to […]

Delhi Hc's Order in Case of Shree Bhavani Power Project Pvt. Ltd. Vs Income Tax Office

Delhi HC: Tax Deduction U/S 80-Ia(7) Can’t Be Rejected Due to Not Filed Audit Report Digitally

The Delhi High Court, the deduction u/s 80-IA(7) of the Income Tax Act cannot be denied for the mere failure of the taxpayer to digitally file an audit report. It was noted by the bench of Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Ravinder Dudeja that the audit report was duly provided to the AO and was […]

Bombay HC's Order in Case of Hemant Mahipatray Shah Vs Anand Upadhyay

Bombay HC Sets Aside Tax Notice Against Director as TDS Already Deposited with Interest

The issuance of the process has been quashed by the Bombay High Court which is served on the directors of the company, M/s. Hubtown Ltd., for offences punishable u/s 276B and 278B of the Income Tax Act for the delay in depositing the TDS as the TDS deducted by the company had already been deposited […]

Bombay HC's Order in Case of Kairos Properties Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Bombay HC Quashes Jurisdictional AO’s Exercise U/S 148A Conducted Outside Faceless Mechanism

Observing that the scheme shown by the Central Government does not envisage exclusion of provision of section 148A since the process shown within the mentioned provisions is inextricably associated with Section 148, the Bombay High Court has quashed the whole exercise that the jurisdiction AO has performed under section 148A outside the faceless procedure. Section […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order in Case of Evita Construction Pvt. Limited Vs. DCIT

Mumbai ITAT Quashes Addition on Interest Income from FD Due to Lack of Evidence

The addition on the interest income received out of the fixed deposits has been deleted by the Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The bench of Kavitha Rajagopal (Judicial Member) and B R Baskaran (Accountant Member) has marked that Assessing Officer (AO) is unable to corroborate the fact that the FD made by […]

Summary of New Changes Under IT Section 148A

Quick Guide to Income Tax Section 148A with New Changes

The Finance Bill 2024 includes changes to Section 148A of the Income-Tax (I-T) Act, which relates to the time limits for issuing notices to reopen assessments. Currently, the Income-Tax Department can reopen assessments under Section 148A for up to 10 years (equivalent to 11 financial years) if the income exceeds Rs 50 lakh. In contrast, […]

Bombay HC's Order in the Case of Benaifer Vispi Patel Vs. The Income Tax Officer

Bombay HC: AO Must Verify the Accuracy of Information Before Initiating a Reassessment

The Bombay High Court has determined that Assessing Officers (AOs) must verify information before initiating reassessment proceedings based on faceless data. This ruling comes from a bench of Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Somasekhar Sundaresan, who underscored the importance of verification when AOs intend to act under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, particularly when […]

Telangana HC's Order in Case of M/S. T S R Exports Vs The Superintendent GST

Telangana HC: GST Notice Must Have Fraud Details for GSTIN Cancellation U/S 29(2)(e)

It was ruled by the Telangana High Court in the case that the SCN should comprise the information on fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts for cancelling the GST registration as under Section 29(2)(e) of CGST Act, 2017. Justice Sujoy Paul and Justice N. Tukaramji marked that “Needless to mention that the show cause […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software