Powerd By SAG INFOTECH
Notifications can be turned of anytime from browser settings
It has been recently held by The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Hyderabad bench that the expenditure that has been incurred by the assessee to repair his house to make it habitable ought to be deducted from the sum of capital gain under section 54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Latest Update in Income Tax […]
Beneath section 54F of the Income Tax Act the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jaipur permits for deduction in respect of residential house property purchases in the name of wife. The taxpayer Dharamvir Singh has the income generated from the house property, capital gain, and interest. He furnishes the return of income showing the total […]
Under section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore in its proceeding said towards the assessing officer to permit the exclusion to the taxpayer upon the invested amount towards buying the house in the name of the daughter. Under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, the person […]
In an order released lately, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) rejected the depreciation claim on Non-Competition Fee. The said claim was filed by the assessee, Fortis Hospitals Ltd., on a recent acquisition of the Wockhardt Group of hospitals under an agreement that included payment of a non-competent fee of Rs. 15.50 crores. The fee […]
As section 194C is a very important section, which is largely involved in business scenarios. If a person who is working in the accounting section in any company then he must have the deep knowledge about the provisions of Section 194C.
The Madras High Court remanded the IGST refund case for reconsideration as the refund was not processed because of the alert raised by the Director General of Data Analytics & Risk Management ( DGRAM ). As per the impugned GST order, the court remarked that the IGST refund claim was that the dealer had not […]
The Delhi High Court asked the appropriate officer to expedite the refund process for a petitioner who asked the Court to direct the refund of a sum of Rs.81,79,52 u/s 54 of the Central Goods and Services Act,2017. The applicant, AJ Flight Reservations Pvt. Ltd., represented by Advocate Vineet Bhatia, had filed a refund claim […]
The tax benefits cannot be refused to the taxpayer because of an error made by the builder in assigning the apartment, the Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled. The bench of Rahul Chaudhary (Judicial Member) and Om Prakash Kant (Accountant Member) noted that the petitioner cannot be penalized for the mistake executed […]
The Madras High Court ruled the Assessing Officer (AO) to permit the transitional credit of purchase tax paid under Section 140 of the TNGST Act, 2017, if the applicant had paid “purchase tax” under Section 12(1) of the TNVAT Act. The bench of Justice C. Saravanan noted that the applicant deserves an opportunity to safeguard […]
