Powerd By SAG INFOTECH
Notifications can be turned of anytime from browser settings
The Madras High Court has remanded a GST order for reconsideration because of the absence of a mandatory personal hearing, as mandated under Section 75(4) of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act. M/s. Vaduvambikai Enterprises contested an order issued via the State Tax Officer without a personal hearing. Represented by P. Rajkumar, the applicant […]
The Madras High Court in a ruling set aside an order for GST obligation because of the non-payment under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM). The matter, Tvl. Kwatra Karteek Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC), is on the violation of natural justice principles and the applicant’s accidental error during filing Form GSTR 3B. The importance of due […]
The Madras High Court in a ruling, set aside the demand order on Rs. 2 lakhs pre-deposit condition. The court witnessed that GST (Goods and Services Tax) returns were not filed and the taxes were not filed at the time of the COVID period due to numerous reasons. The applicant, Nagoorar Enterprises claimed that he […]
The Madras High Court in a recent ruling remanded the case of GSTR 3B & GSTR 1 Mismatch emerged because of the GST (Goods and Services Tax) calculation at 36% for specific items for reconsideration as the department has recovered the amount of Rs.68,677 from the applicant through the way of debit from the applicant’s […]
A reconsideration of the matter has been ordered by Madras HC on a 10% pre-deposit condition concerned with the mismatch between GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A, following a failure to respond to the Show Cause Notice ( SCN ). The applicant, Crystal Granites contested the order because the show cause notice and the impugned order […]
The Madras High Court in a ruling permitted it to challenge the order on a 10% pre-deposit condition as agreed by the applicant for the case of misplacement of Input Tax Credit ( ITC ) in GSTR-3B. The court also marked the petitioner’s submission that he was not able to respond to notices as uploaded […]
Overview The Madras High Court in a judgment addressed the legality of the provisional property attachment u/s 83 of the CGST Act 2017. The same blog explores the court’s decisions for the matter of TVL Maxtile AAC Block Vs State Tax Officer, stating key aspects of tax demand and recovery procedures. Context We know about […]
The Madras High Court in a ruling held that a new SCN u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 will be issued for the problems not raised before. The department was asked to provide a fresh order u/s 148A(d) after regarding the reply of the taxpayer. A Single bench of Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy held […]
The Madras High Court explained that Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax ( CGST Act ), 2017 does not need the audit report to show the ‘Fraud or Misstatement or Suppression of Facts’ for Demand u/s 74 under the GST Act. A single bench of Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy remarked, that nothing is […]
